Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9625159" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I'd just like to note here that pre-authorship isn't required.</p><p></p><p>The only thing that is required is that there is some fact of the matter, within the fictional space. That fact-of-the-matter is <em>most easily</em> done by having it be pre-authored, e.g. by a GM or by an adventure writer, but it does not <em>have</em> to be done that way. Random determination is also possible, or (say) you could have a third party that doesn't know the context picking things out (so that it isn't <em>random</em>, but also isn't strictly "authorship" either.)</p><p></p><p>I've used the word "established" a lot here, and it's not for nothing. The order in which the truth is established matters. If the truth is pre-established--by whatever means, authorship being only one of them--then it is possible to solve for that truth by gathering evidence that points toward it (or which pushes you away from the false conclusions). If the truth is established <em>by</em> the investigation, if the establishment is causally downstream of the investigation, then I don't see how that investigation can be "solving" the mystery. It is, most certainly, still an investigation. But it is an investigation which <strong>creates</strong> a truth, rather than an investigation which <strong>discovers</strong> a truth.</p><p></p><p>If you're creating the truth, you aren't solving for it--you're building it with your own hands. Even if that creation is divided amongst multiple people and bound by strict and reliable rules and procedures, you are still <em>creating</em> that truth.</p><p></p><p>I cannot create the truth that 3+4=7, or at least I have no idea how I would create such a thing. But I most certainly can create a solution to X+Y=7 where X and Y are natural numbers, which <em>does not</em> have a solution as stated. I can create that solution by saying, "I declare that Y is 4, and thus X must be 3." Y could be any number of the set 1 through 6 (possibly 0 through 7, if you are like me and consider 0 a natural number); it is my choice to <em>make</em> Y=3 that creates the possibility of a solution in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9625159, member: 6790260"] I'd just like to note here that pre-authorship isn't required. The only thing that is required is that there is some fact of the matter, within the fictional space. That fact-of-the-matter is [I]most easily[/I] done by having it be pre-authored, e.g. by a GM or by an adventure writer, but it does not [I]have[/I] to be done that way. Random determination is also possible, or (say) you could have a third party that doesn't know the context picking things out (so that it isn't [I]random[/I], but also isn't strictly "authorship" either.) I've used the word "established" a lot here, and it's not for nothing. The order in which the truth is established matters. If the truth is pre-established--by whatever means, authorship being only one of them--then it is possible to solve for that truth by gathering evidence that points toward it (or which pushes you away from the false conclusions). If the truth is established [I]by[/I] the investigation, if the establishment is causally downstream of the investigation, then I don't see how that investigation can be "solving" the mystery. It is, most certainly, still an investigation. But it is an investigation which [B]creates[/B] a truth, rather than an investigation which [B]discovers[/B] a truth. If you're creating the truth, you aren't solving for it--you're building it with your own hands. Even if that creation is divided amongst multiple people and bound by strict and reliable rules and procedures, you are still [I]creating[/I] that truth. I cannot create the truth that 3+4=7, or at least I have no idea how I would create such a thing. But I most certainly can create a solution to X+Y=7 where X and Y are natural numbers, which [I]does not[/I] have a solution as stated. I can create that solution by saying, "I declare that Y is 4, and thus X must be 3." Y could be any number of the set 1 through 6 (possibly 0 through 7, if you are like me and consider 0 a natural number); it is my choice to [I]make[/I] Y=3 that creates the possibility of a solution in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
Top