Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thefutilist" data-source="post: 9627799" data-attributes="member: 7044566"><p>I don't like thinking about this stuff but my mind does its own thing and so I ended up jotting down the skeleton of two games to work through it. Some brief thoughts at the bottom.</p><p></p><p></p><p>THE 'REAL' KEY</p><p></p><p>The occult apocalypse machine is ticking down. In one hour the world will be devoured. You need to find Albrecht Wainwright's key to stop this. The key lies somewhere in his study.</p><p></p><p>GM: Think about Albrecht Wainwright a bit. He's an occultist of some sort. Maybe a medical genius, maybe someone who spent too long thinking about the metaphysics of maths...</p><p></p><p>The location of the key: The key is somewhere in Albrecht's study. Think about the precise location. Base it on the personality of Albrecht. Maybe if he's a medical occultist it's located within a skull on a shelf. That type of thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PLAY</p><p></p><p>The players ask questions about what's here and the GM can give rough details. If the players ask more probing questions then the GM gives even more details.</p><p></p><p>The GM marks time when things are studied. Half a minute at the minimum but as long as the GM thinks it will take (tell the player how long you think it will take before they engage in study)</p><p></p><p>The players can also smash things, open them, burn them, that kind of thing. Tell them the time it will take and mark the time</p><p></p><p></p><p>GM MAKES STUFF UP</p><p></p><p>Your job is simply to say what Albrecht would have in his study and mark time. Some of the stuff that Albrecht has may provide possible clues as the location of the key. That's none of your business though. Your job is just to say what Albrecht has in his office.</p><p></p><p>------</p><p></p><p></p><p>ALBRECHT'S METAPHYSICAL MYSTERY KEY</p><p></p><p>Make up Albrecht but not the location of his key. Play the game as above but when the player investigates something, decide if Albrecht would have put his key there.</p><p></p><p>-------</p><p></p><p>THOUGHTS</p><p></p><p>If 'reason' means heuristic/strategy, then there probably are better or worse strategies in both games. Although I suspect the strategies will be different. If you add a few more rules about how you either convey information or ask for information, the strategies will probably diverge even more.</p><p></p><p>In the state the rules are in. I'm not sure they're that good but I'm guessing a lot of GM's who play this sort of stuff have a load of 'hidden rules' that they're using without even necessarily being aware of them.</p><p></p><p>@EzekialRaiden I think one can evaluate the rules, both hidden and written down, by how well it produces that flash of learning/insight you were talking about earlier. That's the social/aesthetic reward toward which games either contribute or don't. Although that's also got to be off-set by 'play feel'. You're not just looking for flashes of learning, you're looking for those flashes in a game that's similar to the ones above. I'd actually bite the bullet and just say that the players are trying to discover what's in the GM's notes. It's reductive and strips away the magic but it's by stripping away the magic we can evaluate the raw mechanisms by which something operates. (mostly fiat but as we've established, fiat is itself a stripping away, not all fiat is the same)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thefutilist, post: 9627799, member: 7044566"] I don't like thinking about this stuff but my mind does its own thing and so I ended up jotting down the skeleton of two games to work through it. Some brief thoughts at the bottom. THE 'REAL' KEY The occult apocalypse machine is ticking down. In one hour the world will be devoured. You need to find Albrecht Wainwright's key to stop this. The key lies somewhere in his study. GM: Think about Albrecht Wainwright a bit. He's an occultist of some sort. Maybe a medical genius, maybe someone who spent too long thinking about the metaphysics of maths... The location of the key: The key is somewhere in Albrecht's study. Think about the precise location. Base it on the personality of Albrecht. Maybe if he's a medical occultist it's located within a skull on a shelf. That type of thing. PLAY The players ask questions about what's here and the GM can give rough details. If the players ask more probing questions then the GM gives even more details. The GM marks time when things are studied. Half a minute at the minimum but as long as the GM thinks it will take (tell the player how long you think it will take before they engage in study) The players can also smash things, open them, burn them, that kind of thing. Tell them the time it will take and mark the time GM MAKES STUFF UP Your job is simply to say what Albrecht would have in his study and mark time. Some of the stuff that Albrecht has may provide possible clues as the location of the key. That's none of your business though. Your job is just to say what Albrecht has in his office. ------ ALBRECHT'S METAPHYSICAL MYSTERY KEY Make up Albrecht but not the location of his key. Play the game as above but when the player investigates something, decide if Albrecht would have put his key there. ------- THOUGHTS If 'reason' means heuristic/strategy, then there probably are better or worse strategies in both games. Although I suspect the strategies will be different. If you add a few more rules about how you either convey information or ask for information, the strategies will probably diverge even more. In the state the rules are in. I'm not sure they're that good but I'm guessing a lot of GM's who play this sort of stuff have a load of 'hidden rules' that they're using without even necessarily being aware of them. @EzekialRaiden I think one can evaluate the rules, both hidden and written down, by how well it produces that flash of learning/insight you were talking about earlier. That's the social/aesthetic reward toward which games either contribute or don't. Although that's also got to be off-set by 'play feel'. You're not just looking for flashes of learning, you're looking for those flashes in a game that's similar to the ones above. I'd actually bite the bullet and just say that the players are trying to discover what's in the GM's notes. It's reductive and strips away the magic but it's by stripping away the magic we can evaluate the raw mechanisms by which something operates. (mostly fiat but as we've established, fiat is itself a stripping away, not all fiat is the same) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
Top