Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 9632367" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I hope the below will suffice:Any situation in the fiction that arises in a moment before all the facts are established where one of the facts that is later established would have been relevant to the DM using deductive/inductive reasoning to determine some non-preauthored detail the players 'prompt' him about.1.  That's not what I mean by inductive reasoning.2.  Even if it was, i didn't make a statement that no inductive/deductive reasoning could be done.  So it's unclear why you think showing inductive/deductive reasoning being done would be sufficient counterproof of my statement.  At most I said there was specific inductive/deductive reasoning that could not be done.  Thus, actual counterproof would require showing that specific inductive/deductive reasoning was being done.I'll take a look.</blockquote>