Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9635645" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>No, there is clear guidance in the book. That doesn’t mean the GM is not making some decisions or having some input. No one has said that the game is free of GM input. That would be silly. </p><p></p><p>What we’re saying is that there are other parts of the process that very clearly constrain the GM. Gather Information rolls are an example of that. The fact that the players choose the Score as well as the Approach and Detail is another. </p><p></p><p>You’re just dismissing all of that as if it has no impact. This is exactly why your grasp of the game seems incomplete. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So what? Again… he does so bound by several other player contributed factors. </p><p></p><p>The issue has never been GM Authority in and of itself. This is why you misread the OP as being “anti-GM fiat”. It is how multiple instances of GM Authority interact with each other <em>without some amount of player input or system input. </em></p><p></p><p>Blades clearly has plenty of both. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the text of the game never even says if DCs are meant to be shared or kept secret. It literally doesn’t provide direction to the GM on whether or not to disclose a DC to the players. It doesn’t talk about the pros and cons of sharing or not sharing the DC, or how that impacts play. </p><p></p><p>That’s actually pretty remarkable. </p><p></p><p>Nor does the book encourage players to advocate for their view of the situation, as Blades does in regard to Position and Effect. You say that anyone can do so… but do we really need to go far to find the myriad of responses that would foster from trad GMs, ranging from “okay, you’re right DC 15 rather than 20” to “make a note and we’ll discuss after play; for now my decision stands” and on to “you don’t like it, there’s the door, this is MY table”.</p><p></p><p>The amount of player advocacy in the Blades text absolutely dwarfs whatever tidbits appear in most trad books, by an order of magnitude. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh, I don’t expect you’ll adjust your view at all, no. But I’m confident that my understanding of the game and its processes and my posts about them are more compelling an argument than your unsupported assertions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9635645, member: 6785785"] No, there is clear guidance in the book. That doesn’t mean the GM is not making some decisions or having some input. No one has said that the game is free of GM input. That would be silly. What we’re saying is that there are other parts of the process that very clearly constrain the GM. Gather Information rolls are an example of that. The fact that the players choose the Score as well as the Approach and Detail is another. You’re just dismissing all of that as if it has no impact. This is exactly why your grasp of the game seems incomplete. So what? Again… he does so bound by several other player contributed factors. The issue has never been GM Authority in and of itself. This is why you misread the OP as being “anti-GM fiat”. It is how multiple instances of GM Authority interact with each other [I]without some amount of player input or system input. [/I] Blades clearly has plenty of both. But the text of the game never even says if DCs are meant to be shared or kept secret. It literally doesn’t provide direction to the GM on whether or not to disclose a DC to the players. It doesn’t talk about the pros and cons of sharing or not sharing the DC, or how that impacts play. That’s actually pretty remarkable. Nor does the book encourage players to advocate for their view of the situation, as Blades does in regard to Position and Effect. You say that anyone can do so… but do we really need to go far to find the myriad of responses that would foster from trad GMs, ranging from “okay, you’re right DC 15 rather than 20” to “make a note and we’ll discuss after play; for now my decision stands” and on to “you don’t like it, there’s the door, this is MY table”. The amount of player advocacy in the Blades text absolutely dwarfs whatever tidbits appear in most trad books, by an order of magnitude. Oh, I don’t expect you’ll adjust your view at all, no. But I’m confident that my understanding of the game and its processes and my posts about them are more compelling an argument than your unsupported assertions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM fiat - an illustration
Top