Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GM is railroading the party into Civil war. Help!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mneme" data-source="post: 5984563" data-attributes="member: 59248"><p>Ok, first, the idea of leading into conflict in Epic levels between the Keeper of Everflow (who wants to free souls to follow their own destiny) and a Marshal of Letherna is actually kinda awsome. A battle royale final fight, not so much; the best way to handle this stuff is discussion, argumentation, etc, not a simple throwdown, but angst makes for good roleplaying -- and if the midseason baddie is Orcus, there would be reason for you to put your philisophical differences aside (for a while).</p><p></p><p>Second, I don't think a controller/striker battle is as fore-ordained as some do. Sure, a striker can just kill you if they go first -- but the controller can simply shut down the striker. Look at powers that dominate, stun, debuf attacks, or blind.</p><p></p><p>Third -- talk things over with the other player. Don't worry about what the GM is trying to do -- the most he or she can do is "rocks fall, everyone dies". Do you want to play up to a battle royale at the end? Do you want to play out an angsty story where your paths lead in different directions and the party has to decide who to follow? Do you want to play out an angsty story where your paths lead in different directions, and one of you has to turn aside from their path because friendship is more important? Do you want to stay "friends to the end" and avoid conflict?</p><p></p><p>Once you've got a better idea of where the other player is, you'll -both- have a better idea of what direction you want to take things, on a much more solid level than "I want to optimize my character so this isn't just a slaughter."</p><p></p><p>Also, protip: If you -do- go for any of the angsty options, you want to play up the friendship now. Hell, if the characters' sex/orientation is compatable, it would be fun to play out a love plot, just to add spice to the inevitable conflict later on, but even if not, having the characters become friends, rather than just battle companions would made all the angsty options far sweeter (and even some of the less angsty options).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mneme, post: 5984563, member: 59248"] Ok, first, the idea of leading into conflict in Epic levels between the Keeper of Everflow (who wants to free souls to follow their own destiny) and a Marshal of Letherna is actually kinda awsome. A battle royale final fight, not so much; the best way to handle this stuff is discussion, argumentation, etc, not a simple throwdown, but angst makes for good roleplaying -- and if the midseason baddie is Orcus, there would be reason for you to put your philisophical differences aside (for a while). Second, I don't think a controller/striker battle is as fore-ordained as some do. Sure, a striker can just kill you if they go first -- but the controller can simply shut down the striker. Look at powers that dominate, stun, debuf attacks, or blind. Third -- talk things over with the other player. Don't worry about what the GM is trying to do -- the most he or she can do is "rocks fall, everyone dies". Do you want to play up to a battle royale at the end? Do you want to play out an angsty story where your paths lead in different directions and the party has to decide who to follow? Do you want to play out an angsty story where your paths lead in different directions, and one of you has to turn aside from their path because friendship is more important? Do you want to stay "friends to the end" and avoid conflict? Once you've got a better idea of where the other player is, you'll -both- have a better idea of what direction you want to take things, on a much more solid level than "I want to optimize my character so this isn't just a slaughter." Also, protip: If you -do- go for any of the angsty options, you want to play up the friendship now. Hell, if the characters' sex/orientation is compatable, it would be fun to play out a love plot, just to add spice to the inevitable conflict later on, but even if not, having the characters become friends, rather than just battle companions would made all the angsty options far sweeter (and even some of the less angsty options). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
GM is railroading the party into Civil war. Help!
Top