Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM Prep Time - Cognitive Dissonance in Encounter Design?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5188916" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Well, I'll have to agree to disagree there. The existing options have let me build pretty much whatever monsters I need. And when I need to go beyond that... it may be DM fiat, but I've found 4E far more forgiving of the ability to simply add or swap abilities for monsters, and know that it remains an appropriate challenge when I am done. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, I think his argument was more firmly rooted in the context of most by-the-book monsters rather than hand-built NPCs. But even outside of that, I think it also came down to the fact that most melee types tend to have only one thing they do, and it usually was get into combat and full attack. Which certainly isn't an absolute truth - many monsters had abilities like grab, poison, etc. </p><p> </p><p>But - especially with the very important level of <em>mobility</em> in 4E - I think you end up with melee fights playing out much more dynamically than they typically did in 3.5. At least it has been so in my experience. My fighter would run up to an enemy and they would trade blows, whether that enemy was a goblin or an orc or an ogre or a giant. The difference between them was pretty much just how much damage they did. In 4E, I've found myself much more likely to see that goblin manuevering about me during the fight, the orc getting his frenzy on and keep the fight going even when he should drop, the giant stomping me to the ground and stepping on me. The ogre... well, I guess the ogre still pretty much just stands there and hits things. At least one ogre does - but there are a dozen more to choose from if I really want to. </p><p> </p><p>That's the sort of diversity I think Firelance was discussing.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I have no idea what you are trying to say with this sentence. Are you saying it costs more money to buy additional resource books in 4E? I'm not trying to intentionally misinterpret your words here, I'm genuinely confused - would you be able to rephrase your point? I don't know if my brain simply shut down or what, but I have absolutely no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5188916, member: 61155"] Well, I'll have to agree to disagree there. The existing options have let me build pretty much whatever monsters I need. And when I need to go beyond that... it may be DM fiat, but I've found 4E far more forgiving of the ability to simply add or swap abilities for monsters, and know that it remains an appropriate challenge when I am done. Well, I think his argument was more firmly rooted in the context of most by-the-book monsters rather than hand-built NPCs. But even outside of that, I think it also came down to the fact that most melee types tend to have only one thing they do, and it usually was get into combat and full attack. Which certainly isn't an absolute truth - many monsters had abilities like grab, poison, etc. But - especially with the very important level of [I]mobility[/I] in 4E - I think you end up with melee fights playing out much more dynamically than they typically did in 3.5. At least it has been so in my experience. My fighter would run up to an enemy and they would trade blows, whether that enemy was a goblin or an orc or an ogre or a giant. The difference between them was pretty much just how much damage they did. In 4E, I've found myself much more likely to see that goblin manuevering about me during the fight, the orc getting his frenzy on and keep the fight going even when he should drop, the giant stomping me to the ground and stepping on me. The ogre... well, I guess the ogre still pretty much just stands there and hits things. At least one ogre does - but there are a dozen more to choose from if I really want to. That's the sort of diversity I think Firelance was discussing. I have no idea what you are trying to say with this sentence. Are you saying it costs more money to buy additional resource books in 4E? I'm not trying to intentionally misinterpret your words here, I'm genuinely confused - would you be able to rephrase your point? I don't know if my brain simply shut down or what, but I have absolutely no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GM Prep Time - Cognitive Dissonance in Encounter Design?
Top