Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMing vs. Playing: Are Different Books a Double-Standard?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6005090" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>So why do you want others to read your obscure third party game books when you can't even be bothered to keep up with the core content Paizo is putting out? Ultimate Magic and Ultimate Combat are not third party, and are not new and therefore are much closer to a default setup for Pathfinder than anything a third party could come up with. Further, they aren't point buy - and most point buy RPGs can be twisted, folded, and spindled in some really odd directions as the greater flexibility allows players to take things in really unexpected directions. Also Eclipse is a third party product - and I remember well the reputation 3PP content had for 3.0 and 3.5; the most unbalanced stuff you can find. (And woe betide the DM who gives people access even to such a respected publisher as Frog God Games, allowing the PCs to summon Gravity Elementals with Summon Monster II).</p><p> </p><p>Compounding this is that you didn't offer Eclipse when you started DMing. Had you said you wanted to try it out <em>with you in the DMs chair</em> and openly dropped it on the table for anyone to use it would probably have been devoured by your players, over half of them would have used it, and you'd probably have been allowed to use it. But instead you gave your players a set of restrictions that made them chafe and now want to use a book that is way outside the normal rules and even the default assumptions of Pathfinder. Far more overwhelming than the default player options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6005090, member: 87792"] So why do you want others to read your obscure third party game books when you can't even be bothered to keep up with the core content Paizo is putting out? Ultimate Magic and Ultimate Combat are not third party, and are not new and therefore are much closer to a default setup for Pathfinder than anything a third party could come up with. Further, they aren't point buy - and most point buy RPGs can be twisted, folded, and spindled in some really odd directions as the greater flexibility allows players to take things in really unexpected directions. Also Eclipse is a third party product - and I remember well the reputation 3PP content had for 3.0 and 3.5; the most unbalanced stuff you can find. (And woe betide the DM who gives people access even to such a respected publisher as Frog God Games, allowing the PCs to summon Gravity Elementals with Summon Monster II). Compounding this is that you didn't offer Eclipse when you started DMing. Had you said you wanted to try it out [I]with you in the DMs chair[/I] and openly dropped it on the table for anyone to use it would probably have been devoured by your players, over half of them would have used it, and you'd probably have been allowed to use it. But instead you gave your players a set of restrictions that made them chafe and now want to use a book that is way outside the normal rules and even the default assumptions of Pathfinder. Far more overwhelming than the default player options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMing vs. Playing: Are Different Books a Double-Standard?
Top