Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8088916" data-attributes="member: 18">ROFL oh god son wow damn. No, science proved me right. I'm the scientist here, you're the layman making wild claims, in terms of training/knowledge. And societies promote the survival of the weak, so if you have a draconic society, more weak dragons will survive to older ages.Buddy, read your own words - &quot;not every lich succeed&quot;. Yeah, most of them probably don't. For every Vecna, how many lunatic liches do you think there are? Probably quite a few. Vecna is the cream of the crop, he rose to the top, he never eats a... er... anyway, he's not your average Lich.What does that mean in this context, though? I always play a monster true to its personality, knowledge, limitations, advantages and so on (to the best of my ability!). But I play them true, rather than just playing to win - often they're the same thing - but sometimes they're very divergent.I must be doing something right, given people have expressed the opinion that when I run combat it's somehow &quot;better&quot; than other DMs (I suspect it's the RP of the monsters and playing them according to motivations, but I dunno - it might just be that I'm a lot faster with monster turns than other DMs I play with, because I know that's the case).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8088916, member: 18"] ROFL oh god son wow damn. No, science proved me right. I'm the scientist here, you're the layman making wild claims, in terms of training/knowledge. And societies promote the survival of the weak, so if you have a draconic society, more weak dragons will survive to older ages. Buddy, read your own words - "not every lich succeed". Yeah, most of them probably don't. For every Vecna, how many lunatic liches do you think there are? Probably quite a few. Vecna is the cream of the crop, he rose to the top, he never eats a... er... anyway, he's not your average Lich. What does that mean in this context, though? I always play a monster true to its personality, knowledge, limitations, advantages and so on (to the best of my ability!). But I play them true, rather than just playing to win - often they're the same thing - but sometimes they're very divergent. I must be doing something right, given people have expressed the opinion that when I run combat it's somehow "better" than other DMs (I suspect it's the RP of the monsters and playing them according to motivations, but I dunno - it might just be that I'm a lot faster with monster turns than other DMs I play with, because I know that's the case). [/QUOTE]

Verification