Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9803033" data-attributes="member: 6790260">My notion, at least when I formulated the answer, was that the number of sessions is 100% completely irrelevant for someone who gives that answer. The one, and only, consideration--for someone who gives that answer--is the XP total, and nothing else about how the XP was acquired matters. If it took 1000 sessions to reach 2700 XP, then it took 1000 sessions. If it takes 1 session to reach 2700 XP, then it takes 1 session. An estimate of "number of sessions" would be unimportant at best and outright unhelpful at worst, because sessions do not give any form of consistent XP; one session might give none at all, and the next might give more than a thousand, and then the next might give only 100, and then the next might give 600, etc.It's not that you don't know the number of sessions. It's that the number of sessions is irrelevant.</blockquote>