Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMs: How Much Do You Curate Your Adventures To Your Specific PCs, Mechanically Speaking
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9589624" data-attributes="member: 467"><p>This came up in a couple different threads, so i wanted to address it separately.</p><p></p><p>When you are running a game, maybe using existing adventures and maybe creating adventures, or running off the cuff, or whatever in between, how much do you curate those adventures to fit the specific mechanical capabilities of the PCs?</p><p></p><p>I want to start by making the clear distinction here between making the adventure for and about the PCs in general, and specifically making sure the mechanics involved are related to the PCs capabilities. Whether the "story" overall is centered around the PCs is a different question worthy of its own thread.</p><p></p><p>So, to illustrate what I mean, I will make up a Shadowrun example.</p><p></p><p>The "job" is to break into a corporate safe house being used to hold a corporate spy; the PCs are hired by the "aggressor" to get in and extract the spy, or eliminate him, before he can be moved and interrogated by the "victim" corporation. In the non-existent module, the magical and technological defenses, countermeasures, and agent capabilities are spelled out and designed for a "typical" distribution of hackers, samurai, mages and whatever.</p><p></p><p>But let's pretend that your group decided they wanted to play an all girl elf punk band called Pixie Riot that attacks an disrupts corporate activity on the side to make cash to get to their next gig. There is no samurai, but there is a bouncer, and the "rigger" is more into the band van and the sound system than combat drones, while the mage is an illusionist bard type that creates the light shows. Assuming you create a good hook for the PCs from a story involvement perspective, what do you do about the mechanical specifics.</p><p></p><p>Do you:</p><p>A. Play the module as written. it is up to the players to figure out how to make use of their PCs' abilities to get the job done.</p><p>2. Rework the defenses etc to make sure they generally align with the PCs skill sets.</p><p>iii. Make adjustments on the fly and/or be loose with rules interpretations to allow the PCs abilities to work even when they probably shouldn't.</p><p>d) Something else.</p><p></p><p>For my part, assuming session 0 included the fact that I would sometimes be running pre-written scenarios made for shadowrunners, and the players still went with Pixi Riot, I would run the module as written. The players chose their character types, and should be expected to make them work in the campaign. If, however, the premise started with the band, I would rewrite the adventure as much as necessary to make it work for the band.</p><p></p><p>Just briefly, to use a D&D example, I don't usually change the challenges present in a published scenario based on the class etc choices the players make. If the all bard party wants to go ona dungeon delve, that is on them; if the all barbarian party wants to infiltrate a royal ball, good luck, etc..</p><p></p><p>What do you do when the PC mechanical abilities do not match the module you have prepared?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Reynard, post: 9589624, member: 467"] This came up in a couple different threads, so i wanted to address it separately. When you are running a game, maybe using existing adventures and maybe creating adventures, or running off the cuff, or whatever in between, how much do you curate those adventures to fit the specific mechanical capabilities of the PCs? I want to start by making the clear distinction here between making the adventure for and about the PCs in general, and specifically making sure the mechanics involved are related to the PCs capabilities. Whether the "story" overall is centered around the PCs is a different question worthy of its own thread. So, to illustrate what I mean, I will make up a Shadowrun example. The "job" is to break into a corporate safe house being used to hold a corporate spy; the PCs are hired by the "aggressor" to get in and extract the spy, or eliminate him, before he can be moved and interrogated by the "victim" corporation. In the non-existent module, the magical and technological defenses, countermeasures, and agent capabilities are spelled out and designed for a "typical" distribution of hackers, samurai, mages and whatever. But let's pretend that your group decided they wanted to play an all girl elf punk band called Pixie Riot that attacks an disrupts corporate activity on the side to make cash to get to their next gig. There is no samurai, but there is a bouncer, and the "rigger" is more into the band van and the sound system than combat drones, while the mage is an illusionist bard type that creates the light shows. Assuming you create a good hook for the PCs from a story involvement perspective, what do you do about the mechanical specifics. Do you: A. Play the module as written. it is up to the players to figure out how to make use of their PCs' abilities to get the job done. 2. Rework the defenses etc to make sure they generally align with the PCs skill sets. iii. Make adjustments on the fly and/or be loose with rules interpretations to allow the PCs abilities to work even when they probably shouldn't. d) Something else. For my part, assuming session 0 included the fact that I would sometimes be running pre-written scenarios made for shadowrunners, and the players still went with Pixi Riot, I would run the module as written. The players chose their character types, and should be expected to make them work in the campaign. If, however, the premise started with the band, I would rewrite the adventure as much as necessary to make it work for the band. Just briefly, to use a D&D example, I don't usually change the challenges present in a published scenario based on the class etc choices the players make. If the all bard party wants to go ona dungeon delve, that is on them; if the all barbarian party wants to infiltrate a royal ball, good luck, etc.. What do you do when the PC mechanical abilities do not match the module you have prepared? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMs: How Much Do You Curate Your Adventures To Your Specific PCs, Mechanically Speaking
Top