Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMs: What is your prep to play ratio?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9799123" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>One man’s trash is another’s treasure. It’s all a matter of preference, really. </p><p></p><p>But for me… I grew up running modules. I did plenty of homebrew stuff, but we played every module we could find. The further back you go, the smaller they were (generally speaking). They were also less complex. They could be skimmed by the GM and then run. Even if the GM decided to read the whole thing in full, they were 16 or 32 pages, most often. </p><p></p><p>As time passed, they got bigger and more complex and more plot heavy. They weren’t just location based type scenarios… they were ongoing series of events and so on. And I continued to buy and run them.</p><p></p><p>So it was a kind of gradual thing that happened over time and editions. A few years ago, I found myself running <em>Tomb of Annihilation</em>. The first part… the hexcrawl through Chult… went well and was pretty straightforward. Pretty classic wilderness type adventure. But once we moved into the tomb proper, our game started to suffer. It just became a kind of meticulous dungeon crawl. Lots of the things in the dungeon were very complex without needing to be or without justifying the workload. You had to really study it to run it as written. </p><p></p><p>I struggled to do it. And I realized I was being way too faithful to the text. And on top of that, it was going for a kind of play that D&D in general and my group in particular has shifted away from, and for which it’s not best suited. </p><p></p><p>Once I realized what was happening, I stopped worrying about the text. I shifted the focus and improvised more, and things improved. The players were happier, I was happier, the game was more fun. </p><p></p><p>Ultimately, if I want to read for pleasure, there are many options I can go with. What I want out of a game book of any kind is utility at the table. </p><p></p><p>To contrast with ToA, the Mothership module <em>A Pound of Flesh</em> is 64 pages long on digest size pages. It presents a space station for use as a “home base” type location for a campaign. It’s packed with NPCs and factions and locations, and tables to generate more. It has three ongoing situations that can develop on their own if the PCs don’t get involved, with stages for each so that the station is a dynamic place. And it’s all laid out with the expectation that a GM will be referencing this book in play… so it’s organized accordingly. All the locations are on either one page or a two page spread, with all the info you’ll need for that location, including NPCs. Everything is presented in small, easy to reference lists or bullet points. </p><p></p><p>So yeah… when it comes to modules, I vastly prefer utility over volume. My group got easily as much out of <em>A Pound of Flesh</em> as we did <em>Tomb of Annihilation</em>. And at about 20% of the cost and with maybe 20% of the effort to read and run it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I ran RHoD during my group’s 3e days! </p><p></p><p>The one that springs to mind most immediately is <em>The Dracula Dossier </em>for <em>Night’s Black Agents (</em>though I’d use a different system because I am no fan of Gumshoe, probably use <em>Against the Dark Conspiracy). </em></p><p></p><p>The campaign just appeals to me because I’m a huge fan of the novel <em>Dracula</em> and because it’s so ambitious. It takes the premise that the novel is actually an after action report of a British intelligence attempt to recruit Dracula as an asset. The novel as we know it is a redacted version, published in an attempt to cast the events off as fiction. </p><p></p><p>In the modern day, the PCs are given an Unredacted copy, with marginal notes from agents through the years. They actually published <em>Dracula Unredacted </em>which you can hand to your players. They can then use the marginal notes as prompts for investigation and so on. Dracula is of course, still alive and out there. It’s highly improvisational, with multiple takes on the novel’s original characters and their legacies through the modern day. </p><p></p><p>I just am impressed by it and think it could be a lot of fun with the right group, so I want to give it a try.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9799123, member: 6785785"] One man’s trash is another’s treasure. It’s all a matter of preference, really. But for me… I grew up running modules. I did plenty of homebrew stuff, but we played every module we could find. The further back you go, the smaller they were (generally speaking). They were also less complex. They could be skimmed by the GM and then run. Even if the GM decided to read the whole thing in full, they were 16 or 32 pages, most often. As time passed, they got bigger and more complex and more plot heavy. They weren’t just location based type scenarios… they were ongoing series of events and so on. And I continued to buy and run them. So it was a kind of gradual thing that happened over time and editions. A few years ago, I found myself running [I]Tomb of Annihilation[/I]. The first part… the hexcrawl through Chult… went well and was pretty straightforward. Pretty classic wilderness type adventure. But once we moved into the tomb proper, our game started to suffer. It just became a kind of meticulous dungeon crawl. Lots of the things in the dungeon were very complex without needing to be or without justifying the workload. You had to really study it to run it as written. I struggled to do it. And I realized I was being way too faithful to the text. And on top of that, it was going for a kind of play that D&D in general and my group in particular has shifted away from, and for which it’s not best suited. Once I realized what was happening, I stopped worrying about the text. I shifted the focus and improvised more, and things improved. The players were happier, I was happier, the game was more fun. Ultimately, if I want to read for pleasure, there are many options I can go with. What I want out of a game book of any kind is utility at the table. To contrast with ToA, the Mothership module [I]A Pound of Flesh[/I] is 64 pages long on digest size pages. It presents a space station for use as a “home base” type location for a campaign. It’s packed with NPCs and factions and locations, and tables to generate more. It has three ongoing situations that can develop on their own if the PCs don’t get involved, with stages for each so that the station is a dynamic place. And it’s all laid out with the expectation that a GM will be referencing this book in play… so it’s organized accordingly. All the locations are on either one page or a two page spread, with all the info you’ll need for that location, including NPCs. Everything is presented in small, easy to reference lists or bullet points. So yeah… when it comes to modules, I vastly prefer utility over volume. My group got easily as much out of [I]A Pound of Flesh[/I] as we did [I]Tomb of Annihilation[/I]. And at about 20% of the cost and with maybe 20% of the effort to read and run it. I ran RHoD during my group’s 3e days! The one that springs to mind most immediately is [I]The Dracula Dossier [/I]for [I]Night’s Black Agents ([/I]though I’d use a different system because I am no fan of Gumshoe, probably use [I]Against the Dark Conspiracy). [/I] The campaign just appeals to me because I’m a huge fan of the novel [I]Dracula[/I] and because it’s so ambitious. It takes the premise that the novel is actually an after action report of a British intelligence attempt to recruit Dracula as an asset. The novel as we know it is a redacted version, published in an attempt to cast the events off as fiction. In the modern day, the PCs are given an Unredacted copy, with marginal notes from agents through the years. They actually published [I]Dracula Unredacted [/I]which you can hand to your players. They can then use the marginal notes as prompts for investigation and so on. Dracula is of course, still alive and out there. It’s highly improvisational, with multiple takes on the novel’s original characters and their legacies through the modern day. I just am impressed by it and think it could be a lot of fun with the right group, so I want to give it a try. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GMs: What is your prep to play ratio?
Top