Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gnolls and Gestalt - help!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="udalrich" data-source="post: 3955210" data-attributes="member: 53796"><p>LA is difficult to do with gestalt, but requiring it on both sides certainly isn't the correct answer. </p><p></p><p>Let's consider two non-gestalt characters. Fred is a Barbarian 10 with a LA +0 race. George has 5 levels of Barbarian and is a melee-oriented race with a +5 LA. Both are ECL 10, so they are equally powerful (assuming LA works like it's supposed to). </p><p></p><p>Now we make them gestalt Barbarian/Clerics. Fred gets to add 10 levels of cleric. If George's LA applies on both sides, he gets to add 5 levels of cleric. I don't see how, if we started with two characters of the same power, adding 10 levels of cleric to one will balance with adding 5 levels of cleric to the other.</p><p></p><p>Just letting one side be the LA is also probably wrong. A "level" of LA gives things that are good enough to balance 0 skill points, +0 BAB, +0 to all saves and +0 hit points (including the con bonus). One of the more extreme examples, adding Barbarian to Wizard gives 2 skill points (no int bonus), 0.5 BAB, 0.16 Fort save and (approximately) 1d8 hit points (no con bonus). Adding Barbarian to LA would give 4+int skill points, +1 BAB, +.5 Fort save, +0.33 Reflex and Will Save and 1d12+con hit points, which is much better.</p><p></p><p>One solution that I've seen are that you have to apply LA to both sides before any other class. So a 5th level Bard/Barbarian with a LA +3 race would be LA 2/Bard 3 and LA 1/Barbarian 4.</p><p></p><p>I've also seen that a LA +1 uses both sides of a full level, but LA is reduced by one-third or so. So the 5th level Bard/Barbarian with a LA +3 race would be LA 2/Bard 3 and LA 2 /Barbarian 3.</p><p></p><p>Another way of thinking about it is that gestalt classes are stronger than non-gestalt classes. If a race has goodies worth giving up N non-gestalt classes, it's not going to be worthwhile to give up N gestalt classes for the same goodies.</p><p></p><p>If you were ambivalent about playing a LA +0 race or a race with a high LA in a non-gestalt game, would it change your mind if the GM announce that only NPC classes were available? It's obvious (to a power-gamer) that gaining bonuses worth 5 levels of barbarian (a +5 LA race) is a great trade for 5 levels of warrior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="udalrich, post: 3955210, member: 53796"] LA is difficult to do with gestalt, but requiring it on both sides certainly isn't the correct answer. Let's consider two non-gestalt characters. Fred is a Barbarian 10 with a LA +0 race. George has 5 levels of Barbarian and is a melee-oriented race with a +5 LA. Both are ECL 10, so they are equally powerful (assuming LA works like it's supposed to). Now we make them gestalt Barbarian/Clerics. Fred gets to add 10 levels of cleric. If George's LA applies on both sides, he gets to add 5 levels of cleric. I don't see how, if we started with two characters of the same power, adding 10 levels of cleric to one will balance with adding 5 levels of cleric to the other. Just letting one side be the LA is also probably wrong. A "level" of LA gives things that are good enough to balance 0 skill points, +0 BAB, +0 to all saves and +0 hit points (including the con bonus). One of the more extreme examples, adding Barbarian to Wizard gives 2 skill points (no int bonus), 0.5 BAB, 0.16 Fort save and (approximately) 1d8 hit points (no con bonus). Adding Barbarian to LA would give 4+int skill points, +1 BAB, +.5 Fort save, +0.33 Reflex and Will Save and 1d12+con hit points, which is much better. One solution that I've seen are that you have to apply LA to both sides before any other class. So a 5th level Bard/Barbarian with a LA +3 race would be LA 2/Bard 3 and LA 1/Barbarian 4. I've also seen that a LA +1 uses both sides of a full level, but LA is reduced by one-third or so. So the 5th level Bard/Barbarian with a LA +3 race would be LA 2/Bard 3 and LA 2 /Barbarian 3. Another way of thinking about it is that gestalt classes are stronger than non-gestalt classes. If a race has goodies worth giving up N non-gestalt classes, it's not going to be worthwhile to give up N gestalt classes for the same goodies. If you were ambivalent about playing a LA +0 race or a race with a high LA in a non-gestalt game, would it change your mind if the GM announce that only NPC classes were available? It's obvious (to a power-gamer) that gaining bonuses worth 5 levels of barbarian (a +5 LA race) is a great trade for 5 levels of warrior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Gnolls and Gestalt - help!
Top