Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gnome attribute changes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickbeam" data-source="post: 113762" data-attributes="member: 635"><p>I've spent another few hours thinking this over, and felt like posting my random (and often contradictory) thoughts <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> .</p><p></p><p>-- Swapping the CON bonus for an INT bonus makes gnomes more unique, which is a good thing since they occasionally get overlooked as not having a specific niche or archetype.</p><p>-- It's hard to envision or rationalize a class with a STR penalty receiving and extra hit point at every level, or benefitting from an increased Fortitude saving throw.</p><p>-- Granting an INT bonus would infringe on one of the specific human benefits, by increasing gnome skill points. It would also make gnomes better wizards in general, by giving them an extra spell at 1st level.</p><p>-- Making such a change alters the game designers intent, since it appears they did not want any standard race to be considered more intelligent or wise.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for humoring me while I think out loud...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickbeam, post: 113762, member: 635"] I've spent another few hours thinking this over, and felt like posting my random (and often contradictory) thoughts :) . -- Swapping the CON bonus for an INT bonus makes gnomes more unique, which is a good thing since they occasionally get overlooked as not having a specific niche or archetype. -- It's hard to envision or rationalize a class with a STR penalty receiving and extra hit point at every level, or benefitting from an increased Fortitude saving throw. -- Granting an INT bonus would infringe on one of the specific human benefits, by increasing gnome skill points. It would also make gnomes better wizards in general, by giving them an extra spell at 1st level. -- Making such a change alters the game designers intent, since it appears they did not want any standard race to be considered more intelligent or wise. Thanks for humoring me while I think out loud... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gnome attribute changes
Top