Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 3484194" data-attributes="member: 9789">I think it would be a pretty simple thing to apply the rules for increasing monster size in reverse for a golem.&nbsp; The only main thing to note is that a golem has no Con score and gains bonus HP based on its size, so it would probably lose a flat 10 HP going from large to medium.Other than that, you have to ask yourself if you're going to reduce the hit dice as well; typically, something should be under 8 HD if it is medium.And after that it's all about the price.&nbsp; Gaining a size technically increases the cost by 50,000, and every additional HD costs 5000.&nbsp; Going in reverse should probably not take the full amount away, but something similar is a good starting point.I haven't checked the math or anything, but I'm sure TYPO's example is a good one.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 3484194, member: 9789"] I think it would be a pretty simple thing to apply the rules for increasing monster size in reverse for a golem. The only main thing to note is that a golem has no Con score and gains bonus HP based on its size, so it would probably lose a flat 10 HP going from large to medium. Other than that, you have to ask yourself if you're going to reduce the hit dice as well; typically, something should be under 8 HD if it is medium. And after that it's all about the price. Gaining a size technically increases the cost by 50,000, and every additional HD costs 5000. Going in reverse should probably not take the full amount away, but something similar is a good starting point. I haven't checked the math or anything, but I'm sure TYPO's example is a good one. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification