Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
good and evil, what is greater?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark Chance" data-source="post: 1306748" data-attributes="member: 2795"><p>Your scenario is an interesting thought experiment, but it has no relation to things as they really are. The moment a thing or a truth ceases to be perceived, it does not cease to be. That is the fact, or (at least) it is safely claimed to be the fact since no one can demonstrate otherwise.</p><p></p><p>People who honestly believe otherwise (that things that are real are not real in and of themselves) have an annoying tendency to be either sociopaths or university professors. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your assertion assumes without demonstration that all religious and/or moral truths can be arrived at solely through the use of human reason. Most religious traditions reject this assumption. If it is posited that <em>some</em> religious/moral truths can be arrived through the use of human reason, but that others require the use of human reason in conjunction with something else (i.e., divine revelation, faith, et cetera), then variations in the various dogmas and moral conclusions of different religions is entirely explicable.</p><p></p><p>Your assertion also assumes without demonstration that all truth must be arrived at in this lifetime. This is also an assumption that most religious traditions reject. Most religious traditions instead say, basically, that all who honestly and faithfully seek truth will find truth...in this life or the next.</p><p></p><p>What's more, it can be amply demonstrated that in terms of moral conclusions, there is an amazing, indeed universal, set of conclusions that flow from religious inquiry. There are variations, to be sure, but those variations are often due to category errors.</p><p></p><p>For example, "we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal" is a philosophical statement based on a specific religion's moral conclusions (but is also a claim is made by <em>every</em> major world religion, albeit in different words). Unfortunately, in the 18th century, even the brightest often made category errors about who were "men." For reasons based on culture rather than clear and honest thinking, certain groups who are quite obviously "men" were excluded: women, Africans, Jews, Catholics, et cetera.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Chance, post: 1306748, member: 2795"] Your scenario is an interesting thought experiment, but it has no relation to things as they really are. The moment a thing or a truth ceases to be perceived, it does not cease to be. That is the fact, or (at least) it is safely claimed to be the fact since no one can demonstrate otherwise. People who honestly believe otherwise (that things that are real are not real in and of themselves) have an annoying tendency to be either sociopaths or university professors. :D Your assertion assumes without demonstration that all religious and/or moral truths can be arrived at solely through the use of human reason. Most religious traditions reject this assumption. If it is posited that [i]some[/i] religious/moral truths can be arrived through the use of human reason, but that others require the use of human reason in conjunction with something else (i.e., divine revelation, faith, et cetera), then variations in the various dogmas and moral conclusions of different religions is entirely explicable. Your assertion also assumes without demonstration that all truth must be arrived at in this lifetime. This is also an assumption that most religious traditions reject. Most religious traditions instead say, basically, that all who honestly and faithfully seek truth will find truth...in this life or the next. What's more, it can be amply demonstrated that in terms of moral conclusions, there is an amazing, indeed universal, set of conclusions that flow from religious inquiry. There are variations, to be sure, but those variations are often due to category errors. For example, "we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal" is a philosophical statement based on a specific religion's moral conclusions (but is also a claim is made by [i]every[/i] major world religion, albeit in different words). Unfortunately, in the 18th century, even the brightest often made category errors about who were "men." For reasons based on culture rather than clear and honest thinking, certain groups who are quite obviously "men" were excluded: women, Africans, Jews, Catholics, et cetera. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
good and evil, what is greater?
Top