Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
good and evil, what is greater?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark Chance" data-source="post: 1319600" data-attributes="member: 2795"><p>But if all there is to morality is just a myriad different personal codes of honor, then there is no such thing as good or evil. There is just choice. Raw will against raw will. Might makes right. Nietzche's will to power. If such is the nature of morality, neither you nor I are any less evil than anyone else. Even the absolute worst person you can think of, in the final wash, is every bit of virtuous as you are.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ultimately, all arguments rest on an unproveable assumption, what Aristotle termed first principles. They cannot be demonstrated to be true, only reasonable.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah, but I've never claimed logic can explain everything. I do, however, claim that logic is eminently reasonable for at least getting at the roots of things that appear contradictory. Science, which has been almost deified in the past century, is itself based on a system of rules that, like all systems of rules, cannot be used to verify itself. IOW, the scientific method cannot be used to prove the validity of the scientific method. This does point to limits about that which science is competent explain (for example, science cannot speak competently about the supernatural since the supernatural, by definition, transcends science), but this hardly invalidates all of science.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, logic has its limits. Logic cannot, for example, really judge value, but only whether or not the principles that back that value are coherent. Also, logic itself can be used to "prove" spurious conclusions, for a conclusion is only as solid as its premises. Never forget G. K. Chesterton's observation that the problem with insane people isn't that they're illogical but rather is that they are nothing but logical. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Chance, post: 1319600, member: 2795"] But if all there is to morality is just a myriad different personal codes of honor, then there is no such thing as good or evil. There is just choice. Raw will against raw will. Might makes right. Nietzche's will to power. If such is the nature of morality, neither you nor I are any less evil than anyone else. Even the absolute worst person you can think of, in the final wash, is every bit of virtuous as you are. Ultimately, all arguments rest on an unproveable assumption, what Aristotle termed first principles. They cannot be demonstrated to be true, only reasonable. Ah, but I've never claimed logic can explain everything. I do, however, claim that logic is eminently reasonable for at least getting at the roots of things that appear contradictory. Science, which has been almost deified in the past century, is itself based on a system of rules that, like all systems of rules, cannot be used to verify itself. IOW, the scientific method cannot be used to prove the validity of the scientific method. This does point to limits about that which science is competent explain (for example, science cannot speak competently about the supernatural since the supernatural, by definition, transcends science), but this hardly invalidates all of science. Likewise, logic has its limits. Logic cannot, for example, really judge value, but only whether or not the principles that back that value are coherent. Also, logic itself can be used to "prove" spurious conclusions, for a conclusion is only as solid as its premises. Never forget G. K. Chesterton's observation that the problem with insane people isn't that they're illogical but rather is that they are nothing but logical. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
good and evil, what is greater?
Top