Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
good books for a low-magic campaign?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wulf Ratbane" data-source="post: 1734005" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>Hmmm... How to dissect this statement.</p><p></p><p>Let's take your statement at face value for a moment. Given that the party <em>can't beat</em> the monster they are facing, what ruleset can possibly be sufficient? </p><p></p><p>Please note that this is independent of low magic, high magic, or any other consideration other than that the PCs are faced with a monster they can't beat. I am curious how any ruleset can "sufficiently" respond to that. </p><p></p><p>Is the solution, then, to make EVERY monster beatable by ANY party? Is that sufficient?</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, if your statement is simply a straw-man argument, I can only assume that you either do not own or have not read Grim Tales. My "position" as far as the GT ruleset goes is based on a desire to make as much of the existing d20 library (including monsters) usable as is, as possible; and yes, "sufficient" accomodations in the ruleset were made for this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First things first. Keep in mind that the CRs for dragons are already too low. For the true measure of a dragon's power, multiply the CR by x1.5. This is based on a core design parameter that decided to deliberately under-value the CR of dragons in order to make them more "fearsome."</p><p></p><p>Even in D&D, if you go by CR alone (matching the party CR to the dragon) a frontal assault is more than 50% likely to end up in TPK.</p><p></p><p>To the heart of your question, I'd point first at the fact that dragons in staple fantasy are universally deadly creatures on an epic scale. </p><p></p><p>Nowhere in staple medieval fantasy is the hunting and slaying of dragons a typical "adventuring" pastime: If dragons are so plentiful as to build an entire industry around hunting them, I'd say you've left low-magic behind. This is a phenomenon that really only appears in D&D and similar high-fantasy genres.</p><p></p><p>I can't think of an example of a successful frontal assault on a dragon in staple medieval fantasy. Of all of the dragon-slayings I can think of, epic or artifact level magic was involved.</p><p></p><p>So essentially I'd say, if you want to feature a dragon in the game, no changes are necessary, other than to give the PCs the tools they need to slay the dragon (or set them on the path to their retrieval): If there is a dragon, there must be a dragon-bane they can find and use. </p><p></p><p>Wulf</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wulf Ratbane, post: 1734005, member: 94"] Hmmm... How to dissect this statement. Let's take your statement at face value for a moment. Given that the party [i]can't beat[/i] the monster they are facing, what ruleset can possibly be sufficient? Please note that this is independent of low magic, high magic, or any other consideration other than that the PCs are faced with a monster they can't beat. I am curious how any ruleset can "sufficiently" respond to that. Is the solution, then, to make EVERY monster beatable by ANY party? Is that sufficient? On the other hand, if your statement is simply a straw-man argument, I can only assume that you either do not own or have not read Grim Tales. My "position" as far as the GT ruleset goes is based on a desire to make as much of the existing d20 library (including monsters) usable as is, as possible; and yes, "sufficient" accomodations in the ruleset were made for this. First things first. Keep in mind that the CRs for dragons are already too low. For the true measure of a dragon's power, multiply the CR by x1.5. This is based on a core design parameter that decided to deliberately under-value the CR of dragons in order to make them more "fearsome." Even in D&D, if you go by CR alone (matching the party CR to the dragon) a frontal assault is more than 50% likely to end up in TPK. To the heart of your question, I'd point first at the fact that dragons in staple fantasy are universally deadly creatures on an epic scale. Nowhere in staple medieval fantasy is the hunting and slaying of dragons a typical "adventuring" pastime: If dragons are so plentiful as to build an entire industry around hunting them, I'd say you've left low-magic behind. This is a phenomenon that really only appears in D&D and similar high-fantasy genres. I can't think of an example of a successful frontal assault on a dragon in staple medieval fantasy. Of all of the dragon-slayings I can think of, epic or artifact level magic was involved. So essentially I'd say, if you want to feature a dragon in the game, no changes are necessary, other than to give the PCs the tools they need to slay the dragon (or set them on the path to their retrieval): If there is a dragon, there must be a dragon-bane they can find and use. Wulf [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
good books for a low-magic campaign?
Top