Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Good Cop/Bad Cop (skills use in 3.5 Ed)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pax" data-source="post: 1282641" data-attributes="member: 6875"><p>Well, it all depends on the situation. Done cold, and without support ... the most you're getting is that +4.</p><p></p><p> Now, if the party just collectivelyhanded the fellow his/her/it's posterior in open, relatively-fair combat ... that's another circumstance perhaps worthy of a small bonus.</p><p></p><p> If the PCs have authority-of-law (IOW, if they really ARE cops, or the equivalent of cops) and the fellow they're questioning is involved in criminal activities, that would be another (seperate) circumstance worthy of a small bonus.</p><p></p><p> If, during the GC/BC routine, the question-ee is bound up and helpless, and under (believable) threat of imminent physical harm ... that might be yet <strong>another</strong> circumstance bonus.</p><p></p><p> If the players pull the old '20s "bright light" full-scale interrogation routine (relative sensory deprivation, swapping off asking questions and keeping the subject, persistent physical discomfort [temperature, thirst], frightening environment (lots of nearby water for a Fire-elemental type subject, a big bonfire for a Plant-type subject, etc), even the proximity of a large number of torture devices -- wether their use is intended or not) ... if the players do any or all of those, some sort of circumstance bonus would seem appropriate as well.</p><p></p><p>So let's presume they pull the GC/BC routine initially described. They've just kicked the guy's butt, along with a few of the guy's friends' butts, and now have him hogtied in a darkened tent, filled with heat and smoke from a carefully-built fire, in which a couple iron pokers (or even a branding iron, if one is available) have been set to heat up. He's strung up in a painful but not damaging position, and the GC/BC pair go at him rapid-fire, never pausing or letting up; meanwhile, in the background, the other party members discuss the finer points of torture -- it's benefits, it's methods, the moral implications of it's use (it might help to have the paladin stand watch outside). Perhaps while one or another sharpens their knife or sword, keeping a steady rythmic sound of metal-on-whetstone going throughout the interrogation. Throughout this, the subject is denied water, though plenty of cool water is p[resent -- for the PCs to drink from, with obvious sounds of refreshment.</p><p></p><p>Now, that's a nasty situation, and not what I'd call <strong>good</strong>-aligned; but not evil, either (other than to tie him up, noone ever TOUCHES the subject; the hot irons won't ever be used; the discussion about torture is, and will only ever <strong>be</strong>, purely academic).</p><p></p><p> All told, I'd give the +4 (total) for the GC/BC routine ... +2 for overall discomfort ... +2 for visible threat of harm (the hot irons) ... +2 more for audible suggestion of harm (and believe me, the powers of imagination can make even the driest of <em>academic</em> discussions about torture or violent coercion VERY ... persuasive ... when you're tied up and the people discussing it are <strong>decidedly</strong> unfriendly), +2 for being put (and kept) off-balance (require <strong>all</strong> actively-participating characters to make a Concentration check to keep that bit up, btw, maybe DC 10 or 15), and maybe throw a +2 bone to the PC's if they're THAT thorough in putting the whole scenario together. ^_^</p><p></p><p>Thus, total modifiers, for all elements combined, could go as high as +14.</p><p></p><p>Now, since the above is, inherently, a multi-hourprocess, I see no reason not to let the lead PC "take 10" on their Diplomacy or Intimidate skill. So, if they have even 1 rank of the skill in question, they can make that DC of 35, without breaking a sweat. Of course, I was intentionally trying to be a bit generous with modifiers, on teh assumption that this information may be fairly important to the players, and that gettign it may be fairly key for advancing the campaign's plotline.</p><p></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>But wait!</p><p></p><p>While you're being <strong>that</strong> generous with circumstance bonusses in the PC's favor, don't forget circumstance bonusses to the <strong>DC</strong> ... the subject's non-present friends aren't likely to appreciate him caving in (and won't take "but they did X to me" for an excuse). Nor his employer, nor whoever he's giving information ABOUT -- noone likes being ratted out. And they, unlike the presumably good-aligned PCs, won't stop at <strong>threatening</strong> to hurt the subject, they'll <strong>do</strong> it ... or worse!</p><p></p><p>So, assess what sort of circumstances might increase the DC, and apply the right modifiers. If there's a high-level necromancer involved in there somewhere, that (and what he could and WOULD do for revenge), I'd say that's worth at least +5, maybe even +10 or more -- picture being tortured SLOWLY to death, then, being animated as an intelligent undead, only to face a THOUSAND YEARS of continued torture ... !</p><p></p><p> IOW, you're the DM ... right? Take into account circumstances on <strong>both</strong> sides of an issue. The static DCs listed in the book are just rough estimates, to use either as starting poitns, or "good enough" numbers to use when you don't want to slow down gameplay <em>at all</em>.</p><p></p><p>Just remember that they're only guidelines and suggestions, <strong>not</strong> hard and fast rules. Try practicing the trick of saying "This shouldboost success, as shoudl this, and this, and this". That way, when you tell your players "You have +X in circumstance bonusses, go ahead and roll", or "the DC is +Y higher than usual, but you can roll anyway" ... if asked by (possibly incredulous) players "what gives", you will be able to rattle off a list of assorted circumstances that modify the roll and/or DC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pax, post: 1282641, member: 6875"] Well, it all depends on the situation. Done cold, and without support ... the most you're getting is that +4. Now, if the party just collectivelyhanded the fellow his/her/it's posterior in open, relatively-fair combat ... that's another circumstance perhaps worthy of a small bonus. If the PCs have authority-of-law (IOW, if they really ARE cops, or the equivalent of cops) and the fellow they're questioning is involved in criminal activities, that would be another (seperate) circumstance worthy of a small bonus. If, during the GC/BC routine, the question-ee is bound up and helpless, and under (believable) threat of imminent physical harm ... that might be yet [b]another[/b] circumstance bonus. If the players pull the old '20s "bright light" full-scale interrogation routine (relative sensory deprivation, swapping off asking questions and keeping the subject, persistent physical discomfort [temperature, thirst], frightening environment (lots of nearby water for a Fire-elemental type subject, a big bonfire for a Plant-type subject, etc), even the proximity of a large number of torture devices -- wether their use is intended or not) ... if the players do any or all of those, some sort of circumstance bonus would seem appropriate as well. So let's presume they pull the GC/BC routine initially described. They've just kicked the guy's butt, along with a few of the guy's friends' butts, and now have him hogtied in a darkened tent, filled with heat and smoke from a carefully-built fire, in which a couple iron pokers (or even a branding iron, if one is available) have been set to heat up. He's strung up in a painful but not damaging position, and the GC/BC pair go at him rapid-fire, never pausing or letting up; meanwhile, in the background, the other party members discuss the finer points of torture -- it's benefits, it's methods, the moral implications of it's use (it might help to have the paladin stand watch outside). Perhaps while one or another sharpens their knife or sword, keeping a steady rythmic sound of metal-on-whetstone going throughout the interrogation. Throughout this, the subject is denied water, though plenty of cool water is p[resent -- for the PCs to drink from, with obvious sounds of refreshment. Now, that's a nasty situation, and not what I'd call [b]good[/b]-aligned; but not evil, either (other than to tie him up, noone ever TOUCHES the subject; the hot irons won't ever be used; the discussion about torture is, and will only ever [b]be[/b], purely academic). All told, I'd give the +4 (total) for the GC/BC routine ... +2 for overall discomfort ... +2 for visible threat of harm (the hot irons) ... +2 more for audible suggestion of harm (and believe me, the powers of imagination can make even the driest of [i]academic[/i] discussions about torture or violent coercion VERY ... persuasive ... when you're tied up and the people discussing it are [b]decidedly[/b] unfriendly), +2 for being put (and kept) off-balance (require [b]all[/b] actively-participating characters to make a Concentration check to keep that bit up, btw, maybe DC 10 or 15), and maybe throw a +2 bone to the PC's if they're THAT thorough in putting the whole scenario together. ^_^ Thus, total modifiers, for all elements combined, could go as high as +14. Now, since the above is, inherently, a multi-hourprocess, I see no reason not to let the lead PC "take 10" on their Diplomacy or Intimidate skill. So, if they have even 1 rank of the skill in question, they can make that DC of 35, without breaking a sweat. Of course, I was intentionally trying to be a bit generous with modifiers, on teh assumption that this information may be fairly important to the players, and that gettign it may be fairly key for advancing the campaign's plotline. ... But wait! While you're being [b]that[/b] generous with circumstance bonusses in the PC's favor, don't forget circumstance bonusses to the [b]DC[/b] ... the subject's non-present friends aren't likely to appreciate him caving in (and won't take "but they did X to me" for an excuse). Nor his employer, nor whoever he's giving information ABOUT -- noone likes being ratted out. And they, unlike the presumably good-aligned PCs, won't stop at [b]threatening[/b] to hurt the subject, they'll [b]do[/b] it ... or worse! So, assess what sort of circumstances might increase the DC, and apply the right modifiers. If there's a high-level necromancer involved in there somewhere, that (and what he could and WOULD do for revenge), I'd say that's worth at least +5, maybe even +10 or more -- picture being tortured SLOWLY to death, then, being animated as an intelligent undead, only to face a THOUSAND YEARS of continued torture ... ! IOW, you're the DM ... right? Take into account circumstances on [b]both[/b] sides of an issue. The static DCs listed in the book are just rough estimates, to use either as starting poitns, or "good enough" numbers to use when you don't want to slow down gameplay [i]at all[/i]. Just remember that they're only guidelines and suggestions, [b]not[/b] hard and fast rules. Try practicing the trick of saying "This shouldboost success, as shoudl this, and this, and this". That way, when you tell your players "You have +X in circumstance bonusses, go ahead and roll", or "the DC is +Y higher than usual, but you can roll anyway" ... if asked by (possibly incredulous) players "what gives", you will be able to rattle off a list of assorted circumstances that modify the roll and/or DC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Good Cop/Bad Cop (skills use in 3.5 Ed)
Top