Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zogg" data-source="post: 967291" data-attributes="member: 12133">Re: Yeah, I've noticed changes...Considering most of what I am referring to is artwork, marketing and general presentation, of course my statements are going to be subjective. You use the word like it's a bad thing.As for the general idea that we all refer to things in the past as better than the status quo, that is often true. However, when you take Dragon #171 and Dragon #306 and compare and contrast, list what you do like and what you don't like, I would say that's a bit more analytical than nostalgic musings about how &quot;soda tasted better&quot;. I apologize if my post was not thorough enough - I currently don't have a list of exhibits prepared but given the time and interest I may very well do so. Oh, and I've got one of these too....<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:"&nbsp; data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zogg, post: 967291, member: 12133"] [b]Re: Yeah, I've noticed changes...[/b] Considering most of what I am referring to is artwork, marketing and general presentation, of course my statements are going to be subjective. You use the word like it's a bad thing. As for the general idea that we all refer to things in the past as better than the status quo, that is often true. However, when you take Dragon #171 and Dragon #306 and compare and contrast, list what you do like and what you don't like, I would say that's a bit more analytical than nostalgic musings about how "soda tasted better". I apologize if my post was not thorough enough - I currently don't have a list of exhibits prepared but given the time and interest I may very well do so. Oh, and I've got one of these too.... :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]

Verification