Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Good day, gentlemen. Has anyone noticed a striking change in Dragon magazine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fba827" data-source="post: 968471" data-attributes="member: 807"><p>Several of the columns mentioned here by some of you as things you would like to see return for future editions (or new things altogether) are things that would add no value to the magazine to me, personally. It might prompt you to want to read the magazine more, but at the same time those same things would make me want to read the magazine less. Conversly, some of the things that make me want to read the magazine are columns or features that some of you have already mentioned are reasons you do not like the magazine.</p><p></p><p>I find it hard to believe that there is one format that everyone will uniformly agree upon.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's just plain and simple fact that what some people like, others will not and visa versa.</p><p></p><p>If you don't like how the magazine is formatted, send an Email or postal letter to Pazio and let them know what columns / features / art-style you would like to see more of and what columns / features / art-style that you would like to see less of. </p><p></p><p>You would accomplish much more that way (it has more chance to go into a company archieve of Email / letters) as opposed to remarking on a message board.</p><p></p><p>It does not need to go into long-winded nitpicking or personal remarks (and, in fact, to be most effective, it should not be) -- it is after all simply your opinion of what you like and what you don't like.</p><p></p><p>Remember, it is a letter to a business, not to a college friend, so keep it clear, concise, informed, and simple. Using a word from earlier in the thread, you can be impassioned in your comments to Pazio still remember that you are writing to a professional organization. Your message is probably going to garner more attention and respect if it can be seen as a professional letter (again, I am simply referring to if you were to actually write a letter, be it postal mail or Email, to Pazio).</p><p></p><p>You may very well only get back what seems like a "canned" response. But that canned response is what basically allows them to acknowledge to you that they have received and reviewed the Email. If they have any sort of internal company organization, someone will be able to read the comments in detail at some time. Even if they arenot changes that they are able to incorporate at that very issue, it would be information for them to keep available in case there is such a time that they decide to revisit the topic / possibility.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure if they would appreciate and welcome the information and constructive feedback. </p><p></p><p>They no doubt have a very hard time trying to figure out what the balance of different features would be.</p><p></p><p>Same comments go for artwork, etc. - just didn't want to keep saying "features and artwork and layout" all the time.</p><p></p><p>just my rambles.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fba827, post: 968471, member: 807"] Several of the columns mentioned here by some of you as things you would like to see return for future editions (or new things altogether) are things that would add no value to the magazine to me, personally. It might prompt you to want to read the magazine more, but at the same time those same things would make me want to read the magazine less. Conversly, some of the things that make me want to read the magazine are columns or features that some of you have already mentioned are reasons you do not like the magazine. I find it hard to believe that there is one format that everyone will uniformly agree upon. It's just plain and simple fact that what some people like, others will not and visa versa. If you don't like how the magazine is formatted, send an Email or postal letter to Pazio and let them know what columns / features / art-style you would like to see more of and what columns / features / art-style that you would like to see less of. You would accomplish much more that way (it has more chance to go into a company archieve of Email / letters) as opposed to remarking on a message board. It does not need to go into long-winded nitpicking or personal remarks (and, in fact, to be most effective, it should not be) -- it is after all simply your opinion of what you like and what you don't like. Remember, it is a letter to a business, not to a college friend, so keep it clear, concise, informed, and simple. Using a word from earlier in the thread, you can be impassioned in your comments to Pazio still remember that you are writing to a professional organization. Your message is probably going to garner more attention and respect if it can be seen as a professional letter (again, I am simply referring to if you were to actually write a letter, be it postal mail or Email, to Pazio). You may very well only get back what seems like a "canned" response. But that canned response is what basically allows them to acknowledge to you that they have received and reviewed the Email. If they have any sort of internal company organization, someone will be able to read the comments in detail at some time. Even if they arenot changes that they are able to incorporate at that very issue, it would be information for them to keep available in case there is such a time that they decide to revisit the topic / possibility. I'm sure if they would appreciate and welcome the information and constructive feedback. They no doubt have a very hard time trying to figure out what the balance of different features would be. Same comments go for artwork, etc. - just didn't want to keep saying "features and artwork and layout" all the time. just my rambles. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Good day, gentlemen. Has anyone noticed a striking change in Dragon magazine?
Top