Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good non-evocation anti-undead spells?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1121735" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>In the end, the DM will have to decide what 'interact' means in a game.</p><p></p><p>I just reread the section on 'saving throws and illusions (disbelief)' in the 3.5 PHB. It gives two options for getting a saving throw: 'Stop and study' or 'interact with it in some fashion'.</p><p></p><p>I think we'll both agree that 'mindless' undead can not stop and study an illusion. Perhaps if given specific instructions to do so, but generally not.</p><p></p><p>'Interact with in some fashion' sounds pretty broad to me. Adding 'in some fashion' indicates to me an attempt to broaden the scope of the language and create a very easily met requirement. If the presence of the illusion caused a reaction by the victim, it has interacted with the viewer in some fashion. </p><p></p><p>The book then goes on to mention two fairly contradictory situations: It suggests probing an illusionary floor is what is sufficient to allow a saving throw, yet it then says that a character faced with proof that an illusion isn't real needs no saving throw. If I take a long stick and stick it through a seemingly solid looking piece of floor and my stick sinks one foot through the floor, that seems to be pretty 'solid' proof that the floor is not real, thus negating the need for a saving throw. It looks top me like they applied the same threshold to 'what is needed to get a saving throw' and 'what is needed to automatically disbelieve'. </p><p></p><p>In the end, the DM has to decide exactly how to interpret what constitutes an interaction. My definition is anything that would change the actions of the victim (which is hard for the DM to figure out sometimes ... if the party knew a side hallway covered by an illusion of a wall was present, would they go down that hallway or go along the same path as they would go down if the side hallway was not there?)</p><p></p><p>**************</p><p></p><p>Back to the original subject, though, you might want to consider buying a wand. I find that Otiluke's Resilient Sphere is excellent against most undead. It is especially great against incorporeal foes. You may not be able to play 'hampster ball' with it anymore, but you can use it to keep yourself safe if the undead gets out of hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1121735, member: 2629"] In the end, the DM will have to decide what 'interact' means in a game. I just reread the section on 'saving throws and illusions (disbelief)' in the 3.5 PHB. It gives two options for getting a saving throw: 'Stop and study' or 'interact with it in some fashion'. I think we'll both agree that 'mindless' undead can not stop and study an illusion. Perhaps if given specific instructions to do so, but generally not. 'Interact with in some fashion' sounds pretty broad to me. Adding 'in some fashion' indicates to me an attempt to broaden the scope of the language and create a very easily met requirement. If the presence of the illusion caused a reaction by the victim, it has interacted with the viewer in some fashion. The book then goes on to mention two fairly contradictory situations: It suggests probing an illusionary floor is what is sufficient to allow a saving throw, yet it then says that a character faced with proof that an illusion isn't real needs no saving throw. If I take a long stick and stick it through a seemingly solid looking piece of floor and my stick sinks one foot through the floor, that seems to be pretty 'solid' proof that the floor is not real, thus negating the need for a saving throw. It looks top me like they applied the same threshold to 'what is needed to get a saving throw' and 'what is needed to automatically disbelieve'. In the end, the DM has to decide exactly how to interpret what constitutes an interaction. My definition is anything that would change the actions of the victim (which is hard for the DM to figure out sometimes ... if the party knew a side hallway covered by an illusion of a wall was present, would they go down that hallway or go along the same path as they would go down if the side hallway was not there?) ************** Back to the original subject, though, you might want to consider buying a wand. I find that Otiluke's Resilient Sphere is excellent against most undead. It is especially great against incorporeal foes. You may not be able to play 'hampster ball' with it anymore, but you can use it to keep yourself safe if the undead gets out of hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good non-evocation anti-undead spells?
Top