Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good rule of thumb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="True_Blue" data-source="post: 5342284" data-attributes="member: 49066"><p>The original post just looks like a big way to say "hey you, dont worry your pretty little head, just listen to the people who have been here longer" or "sigh, look at that cute little guy, doesn't he understand the people who have been participating more are talking, you should really listen", both in a derogatory way.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, at first I thought there was no way you were actually serious, But the more I think about it, and reflect upon other messageboards I've seen, I really do think you are. Its really kind of laughable in a weird way. It really doesn't encourage new people to come to the boards either, when you are basically saying "well sure you can argue, but if the veterans are arguing against you, you would just help us out by being quiet".</p><p></p><p>Now I've seen threads where a person just did not quit, no matter how many people told and showed them how they are wrong. I can understand that gets frustrating, and sometimes it can be even quite funny. But to create a thread like this where you are trying to suggest to newcomers that they are probably wrong if they are arguing against veterans? I dunno, just sounds a little elitist in my eyes. But thats just my opinion.</p><p></p><p>I'll even agree with you that probably the people who have posted more about rules interactions and questions know a little more and see the interactions clearer. They probably even post more correct answers, thats greats. But it should be up to them to keep proving it, not they should "win" the argument because they've been here longer or post more. Thats just... weird and crazy. If eventually the arguing party does not understand, no matter how many people tell them they are wrong or show them, the correct response is to say "Well we've all shown the facts, and if you can't look at them and understand the working from them, than there's nothing more we can do for you", not "well I have been here longer and posted more..so you should just give up".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="True_Blue, post: 5342284, member: 49066"] The original post just looks like a big way to say "hey you, dont worry your pretty little head, just listen to the people who have been here longer" or "sigh, look at that cute little guy, doesn't he understand the people who have been participating more are talking, you should really listen", both in a derogatory way. Honestly, at first I thought there was no way you were actually serious, But the more I think about it, and reflect upon other messageboards I've seen, I really do think you are. Its really kind of laughable in a weird way. It really doesn't encourage new people to come to the boards either, when you are basically saying "well sure you can argue, but if the veterans are arguing against you, you would just help us out by being quiet". Now I've seen threads where a person just did not quit, no matter how many people told and showed them how they are wrong. I can understand that gets frustrating, and sometimes it can be even quite funny. But to create a thread like this where you are trying to suggest to newcomers that they are probably wrong if they are arguing against veterans? I dunno, just sounds a little elitist in my eyes. But thats just my opinion. I'll even agree with you that probably the people who have posted more about rules interactions and questions know a little more and see the interactions clearer. They probably even post more correct answers, thats greats. But it should be up to them to keep proving it, not they should "win" the argument because they've been here longer or post more. Thats just... weird and crazy. If eventually the arguing party does not understand, no matter how many people tell them they are wrong or show them, the correct response is to say "Well we've all shown the facts, and if you can't look at them and understand the working from them, than there's nothing more we can do for you", not "well I have been here longer and posted more..so you should just give up". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good rule of thumb
Top