Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good rule of thumb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5342517" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>I believe that the proposed Rules of Thumb are too simple and vague, and therefore not adequate to the designated task.</p><p> </p><p>I use a Rule of Thumb Houserule that produces a much more accurate result. I know that it's more accurate because...well...because I just know things (and Houserules are always better). This system is universal, and is equally accurate in all disagreements, not just 4E rules disagreements.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Step 1: Determine the age of the disagreeing parties. The older person is more likley to be correct because they are smarter, and younger people aren't...</p><p> </p><p>Step 2: (used in case the disagreeing parties ages are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Determine the "Join Date" of the disagreeing parties. The person with the oldest "Join Date" is more likely to be correct as they have probably read more threads and posts. (Also because those with a newer "Join Date", much like those with low post counts, are less likely to understand the intricacies of internet forum humor.)</p><p> </p><p>Step 3: (used in case all of the above are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Either determine the disagreeing parties likely primary language by finding the posters location, or tally up each posters spelling and grammar mistakes. Posters with English as their primary language, or the least amount of spelling and grammar mistakes, are almost always correct compared to those with a primary language other than English, or more spelling and grammar mistakes. Even if the poster has English as their primary language, if they are not posting from an English speaking country, they are considered to be out of practice, and therefore not as likely to be correct (and will probably have more spelling and grammar errors anyways). Exceptions: Some specific words, such as "p0wn" and "torphies", are not considered spelling mistakes. Any posts in another language, such as Klingon, are automatically considered to be completely inaccurate (unless it's a disagreement about the specific language).</p><p> </p><p>Step 4: (used in case all of the above are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Determine the alphabetical order of the parties screen names (using the English alphabet!). The accuracy of the poster is likely greater the higher the posters alphabetical order is (relative to the disagreeing parties).</p><p> </p><p>Step 5: (used to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Flip a coin to determine which rule to use next: Heads - Use <strong><u>DEFCON 1</u></strong>'s and <strong><u>Jack99</u></strong>'s Rules of Thumb; Tails - Flip a coin as a tie breaker (Heads - you're right; Tails - You're also right).</p><p> </p><p>Step 6: (used if all else fails) - Ask <strong><u>Piratecat</u></strong> or another moderator for a formal adjudication...(in which case they may or may not flip a coin)...</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The above procedures will guarantee a minimum accuracy of 99.998765437%.</p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5342517, member: 59506"] I believe that the proposed Rules of Thumb are too simple and vague, and therefore not adequate to the designated task. I use a Rule of Thumb Houserule that produces a much more accurate result. I know that it's more accurate because...well...because I just know things (and Houserules are always better). This system is universal, and is equally accurate in all disagreements, not just 4E rules disagreements. Step 1: Determine the age of the disagreeing parties. The older person is more likley to be correct because they are smarter, and younger people aren't... Step 2: (used in case the disagreeing parties ages are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Determine the "Join Date" of the disagreeing parties. The person with the oldest "Join Date" is more likely to be correct as they have probably read more threads and posts. (Also because those with a newer "Join Date", much like those with low post counts, are less likely to understand the intricacies of internet forum humor.) Step 3: (used in case all of the above are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Either determine the disagreeing parties likely primary language by finding the posters location, or tally up each posters spelling and grammar mistakes. Posters with English as their primary language, or the least amount of spelling and grammar mistakes, are almost always correct compared to those with a primary language other than English, or more spelling and grammar mistakes. Even if the poster has English as their primary language, if they are not posting from an English speaking country, they are considered to be out of practice, and therefore not as likely to be correct (and will probably have more spelling and grammar errors anyways). Exceptions: Some specific words, such as "p0wn" and "torphies", are not considered spelling mistakes. Any posts in another language, such as Klingon, are automatically considered to be completely inaccurate (unless it's a disagreement about the specific language). Step 4: (used in case all of the above are the same, cannot be determined, or to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Determine the alphabetical order of the parties screen names (using the English alphabet!). The accuracy of the poster is likely greater the higher the posters alphabetical order is (relative to the disagreeing parties). Step 5: (used to further refine the accuracy of the projection) - Flip a coin to determine which rule to use next: Heads - Use [B][U]DEFCON 1[/U][/B]'s and [B][U]Jack99[/U][/B]'s Rules of Thumb; Tails - Flip a coin as a tie breaker (Heads - you're right; Tails - You're also right). Step 6: (used if all else fails) - Ask [B][U]Piratecat[/U][/B] or another moderator for a formal adjudication...(in which case they may or may not flip a coin)... The above procedures will guarantee a minimum accuracy of 99.998765437%. B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good rule of thumb
Top