Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good sorcerers can't cast [Evil] spells!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takasi" data-source="post: 3314301" data-attributes="member: 20194"><p>The grammar is tough to think of off the top of my head. I can try to point out the assumptions though.</p><p></p><p>#1 assumes that the statement "A cleric can't cast spells..." applies to all spells, whether they are arcane, divine or acquired from another class. Does this mean he cannot cast them at all (even if he wanted to) or does it mean he loses his class abilities? Unlike other descriptions of class restrictions (paladin, monk, druid) there is no wording here, so one can assume he cannot cast them at all even if he wanted to. Does this make sense in game? No. It would seem that this is how the rules are written though.</p><p></p><p>#2 includes the word "all". That is a major assumption. The exact wording is "prepares and casts spells the way a cleric does". Does this mean a druid or ranger has all of the restrictions? The term "the way" is important here, as it implies a similar (and not necessarily exact) method. If you take into account the layout and positioning of the text in the ranger and druid descriptions you'll see they are both at or near the last paragraph of the spells section. Here is the last paragraph for cleric spells. I would assume you can substitute the word cleric with ranger or druid:</p><p></p><p>"Clerics do not acquire their spells through books or scrolls, nor do they prepare them through study. Instead, they meditate or pray for their spells, receiving them through their own strength of faith or as divine inspiration."</p><p></p><p>Here's a question to ask in this discussion. A new class, let's call it the Prayermage, does not acquire its spells through books or scrolls. Instead the Prayermage meditates for its spells, receiving them through strength of faith. Could you (with proper grammer) now say that the Prayermage prepares spells the way a cleric does? Not the same way a cleric does, but the way a cleric does? </p><p></p><p>These are the most important items to resolve in this argument IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takasi, post: 3314301, member: 20194"] The grammar is tough to think of off the top of my head. I can try to point out the assumptions though. #1 assumes that the statement "A cleric can't cast spells..." applies to all spells, whether they are arcane, divine or acquired from another class. Does this mean he cannot cast them at all (even if he wanted to) or does it mean he loses his class abilities? Unlike other descriptions of class restrictions (paladin, monk, druid) there is no wording here, so one can assume he cannot cast them at all even if he wanted to. Does this make sense in game? No. It would seem that this is how the rules are written though. #2 includes the word "all". That is a major assumption. The exact wording is "prepares and casts spells the way a cleric does". Does this mean a druid or ranger has all of the restrictions? The term "the way" is important here, as it implies a similar (and not necessarily exact) method. If you take into account the layout and positioning of the text in the ranger and druid descriptions you'll see they are both at or near the last paragraph of the spells section. Here is the last paragraph for cleric spells. I would assume you can substitute the word cleric with ranger or druid: "Clerics do not acquire their spells through books or scrolls, nor do they prepare them through study. Instead, they meditate or pray for their spells, receiving them through their own strength of faith or as divine inspiration." Here's a question to ask in this discussion. A new class, let's call it the Prayermage, does not acquire its spells through books or scrolls. Instead the Prayermage meditates for its spells, receiving them through strength of faith. Could you (with proper grammer) now say that the Prayermage prepares spells the way a cleric does? Not the same way a cleric does, but the way a cleric does? These are the most important items to resolve in this argument IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Good sorcerers can't cast [Evil] spells!
Top