Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Good vs Evil: a matter of aims or a matter of means?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trickstergod" data-source="post: 1907661" data-attributes="member: 10825"><p>It's about now that I almost wish I was a bit more familiar with <em>City of the Spider Queen</em>, as I find the random "Seek treasure in evil lands and kill anything evil that gets in the way" is pretty much evil in and of itself...oh well. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I'm with Geron in saying that both counts. However, I do believe that the means count more. Presuming, of course, that you're working towards a good end, anyway; whether you achieve it or not is another matter altogether. But it's the means and motivation that count for quite a bit. </p><p></p><p>Often enough, it seems that the means is all that separates one group from being called good and another one evil. Without trying to delve too much into forbidden, thread-closing or post erasing areas, let's take religion, for example. There's a number of wars that were fought, at least in part, to convert the opposing side over or to wipe their religion away. Conversely, there's a number of missionary's who went ostensibly alone into hostile societies with that same thought of conversion in mind, where the only life likely to be lost was the missionary's. Essentially the same ends, drastically different means and ones that I think illustrate my point decently enough. </p><p></p><p>For that matter, I fully believe evil people can have good ends in mind. Road to hell, good intentions, all that. Take <em>The Watchmen</em>, for example, specifically Ozymandias and Rorschach. In my mind, Ozymandias is clearly evil. He has essentially a good end in mind, but the means he takes is as reprehensible as it gets. Meanwhile Rorscach, though he has other problems that definitely conflict with his alignment if you want to boil it down to that, stands out as the more moral of the two. Sure, if he was allowed to relate what he knew about what happened to the world it would probably be catastrophic, but he's not willing to sully his hands in the way that Ozymandias is to achieve his ends. Idealistic, a bit stupid perhaps, but that's what I feel good is (again, like I said, Rorschach definitely has other problems going on, but those aren't what I'm getting into right now). </p><p></p><p>As I see it, good is the ideal, whereas neutral and evil are essentially practical and pragmatic with varying degrees of selfishness and extremes they're willing to go to thrown in there. So yes, the means edge out the ends. I think you can find any number of individuals who had ends that could be argued as essentially good, yet aren't people you'd exactly describe as good by any means.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trickstergod, post: 1907661, member: 10825"] It's about now that I almost wish I was a bit more familiar with [i]City of the Spider Queen[/i], as I find the random "Seek treasure in evil lands and kill anything evil that gets in the way" is pretty much evil in and of itself...oh well. Anyway, I'm with Geron in saying that both counts. However, I do believe that the means count more. Presuming, of course, that you're working towards a good end, anyway; whether you achieve it or not is another matter altogether. But it's the means and motivation that count for quite a bit. Often enough, it seems that the means is all that separates one group from being called good and another one evil. Without trying to delve too much into forbidden, thread-closing or post erasing areas, let's take religion, for example. There's a number of wars that were fought, at least in part, to convert the opposing side over or to wipe their religion away. Conversely, there's a number of missionary's who went ostensibly alone into hostile societies with that same thought of conversion in mind, where the only life likely to be lost was the missionary's. Essentially the same ends, drastically different means and ones that I think illustrate my point decently enough. For that matter, I fully believe evil people can have good ends in mind. Road to hell, good intentions, all that. Take [i]The Watchmen[/i], for example, specifically Ozymandias and Rorschach. In my mind, Ozymandias is clearly evil. He has essentially a good end in mind, but the means he takes is as reprehensible as it gets. Meanwhile Rorscach, though he has other problems that definitely conflict with his alignment if you want to boil it down to that, stands out as the more moral of the two. Sure, if he was allowed to relate what he knew about what happened to the world it would probably be catastrophic, but he's not willing to sully his hands in the way that Ozymandias is to achieve his ends. Idealistic, a bit stupid perhaps, but that's what I feel good is (again, like I said, Rorschach definitely has other problems going on, but those aren't what I'm getting into right now). As I see it, good is the ideal, whereas neutral and evil are essentially practical and pragmatic with varying degrees of selfishness and extremes they're willing to go to thrown in there. So yes, the means edge out the ends. I think you can find any number of individuals who had ends that could be argued as essentially good, yet aren't people you'd exactly describe as good by any means. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Good vs Evil: a matter of aims or a matter of means?
Top