Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 9658297" data-attributes="member: 177">Even in general, that verbiage has apologist tones, especially when there is no bridge or conversation going on.  There seems to be no attempt to address or redress the issue folks seem most upset about.  Empty words should not impress us, and should, indeed, raise skeptical eyebrows.If this opened with, "Bob reached out to me, said he had realized some of this error, and wanted to start to make amends, and this is how we want to try to do that..." it might be a different story.  I'm okay with making way for folks to try to be better.  As it stands, though, it is a business agreement with a bigot to get a limited run of a remake of an old product.  The plan to make it so that JG gets as little money as possible I accept as a decent try.  But it isn't enough to make me feel good about participating in this legacy.</blockquote>