Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Goodman Games Releasing 4e Adventures Prior to October 1st
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnRTroy" data-source="post: 4324325" data-attributes="member: 2732"><p>Saying "Compatible with Dungeons and Dragons" might be a trademark violation. That's unclear.</p><p></p><p>There is such a thing as fair use and nominal use. For instance, you can use the "phrase" of a trademark when making product comparisons, and courts have started defending the "nominal" use of a trademark if it's part of your past. For instance, an ex-playboy centerfold was able to describe herself as that as long as she didn't try to use the bunny ears or official logo--you can use the name (again, not the official logo) of a band in an unauthorized biography, and former members of bands have been able to at least describe themselves as "formerly of <band name>".</p><p></p><p>However, it gets less clear with advertising, or product labeling, since saying you are compatible with implies endorsement. Your selling an unlicesenced product that purports compatibility without authorization--ESPECIALLY when they have an existing licensing policy in play. So that can lead to a lawsuit. </p><p></p><p>When Gary Gygax released a couple of books about Role-Playing in general in the late 1980s, they described him as creator of D&D or Advanced Dungeons and Dragons, and if I remember correctly they clearly said on the back cover "D&D is a registered trademark of TSR--the use of this trademark has not be authorized by TSR". (If he had done in in recent years he could have been protected by nominal use precedent).</p><p></p><p>The safest way to describe compatibility is not refer to the trademark at all but say "compatible with the most popular Fantasy RPG". For instance, there are meals compatible with Nutri-System or Jenny Craig, and they say "worth 3 points", but do NOT define which system they are compatible with.</p><p></p><p>The trickier (and not 100% legally protected) is to use the trademark in plain text, indicate it's status (tm or R), indicate who it's registered to, and even say your product is not endorsed or authorized. But I think they could still take legal action. The safest thing is not to mention the Trademark at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnRTroy, post: 4324325, member: 2732"] Saying "Compatible with Dungeons and Dragons" might be a trademark violation. That's unclear. There is such a thing as fair use and nominal use. For instance, you can use the "phrase" of a trademark when making product comparisons, and courts have started defending the "nominal" use of a trademark if it's part of your past. For instance, an ex-playboy centerfold was able to describe herself as that as long as she didn't try to use the bunny ears or official logo--you can use the name (again, not the official logo) of a band in an unauthorized biography, and former members of bands have been able to at least describe themselves as "formerly of <band name>". However, it gets less clear with advertising, or product labeling, since saying you are compatible with implies endorsement. Your selling an unlicesenced product that purports compatibility without authorization--ESPECIALLY when they have an existing licensing policy in play. So that can lead to a lawsuit. When Gary Gygax released a couple of books about Role-Playing in general in the late 1980s, they described him as creator of D&D or Advanced Dungeons and Dragons, and if I remember correctly they clearly said on the back cover "D&D is a registered trademark of TSR--the use of this trademark has not be authorized by TSR". (If he had done in in recent years he could have been protected by nominal use precedent). The safest way to describe compatibility is not refer to the trademark at all but say "compatible with the most popular Fantasy RPG". For instance, there are meals compatible with Nutri-System or Jenny Craig, and they say "worth 3 points", but do NOT define which system they are compatible with. The trickier (and not 100% legally protected) is to use the trademark in plain text, indicate it's status (tm or R), indicate who it's registered to, and even say your product is not endorsed or authorized. But I think they could still take legal action. The safest thing is not to mention the Trademark at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Goodman Games Releasing 4e Adventures Prior to October 1st
Top