Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Google doodle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6260391" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>I don't think it is specious at all, for this context. Yes, shows do lose viewers over time, and not all of that loss will be due to the controversy. But however they lost it, they did lose it. For a popular show, typical ratings loss is more like 10%, as I understand. A drop of over a quarter is serious trouble. </p><p></p><p>The public media noise around the controversy is just smoke. What tells, in the end, is the viewership. If there were really solid backing for the star and his ideas, viewership should have been up (or at least flat), not way down, for that season premier. Some noisy people made a stink, but that did not translate into supportive results or action in the long run. </p><p></p><p>So, if we are to use that controversy as an indicator - while some noisy people may make a stink about the Google doodle, or the Coke or Cheerios ad, that noise will not correlate to action. Apparently, the risk for taking such a stand is not large*. Heck, the Superbowl Cheerios ad was the second of its kind - some people made a stink about the first. If the business found that it ultimately hurt them, do you really think they'd have so deliberately thumbed their nose at those people a second time? No! </p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*As Tom Lehrer satirically noted, "It takes a certain amount of courage to get up in a coffee-house or a college auditorium and come out in favor of the things that everybody else in the audience is against - like peace and justice and brotherhood and so on."</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6260391, member: 177"] I don't think it is specious at all, for this context. Yes, shows do lose viewers over time, and not all of that loss will be due to the controversy. But however they lost it, they did lose it. For a popular show, typical ratings loss is more like 10%, as I understand. A drop of over a quarter is serious trouble. The public media noise around the controversy is just smoke. What tells, in the end, is the viewership. If there were really solid backing for the star and his ideas, viewership should have been up (or at least flat), not way down, for that season premier. Some noisy people made a stink, but that did not translate into supportive results or action in the long run. So, if we are to use that controversy as an indicator - while some noisy people may make a stink about the Google doodle, or the Coke or Cheerios ad, that noise will not correlate to action. Apparently, the risk for taking such a stand is not large*. Heck, the Superbowl Cheerios ad was the second of its kind - some people made a stink about the first. If the business found that it ultimately hurt them, do you really think they'd have so deliberately thumbed their nose at those people a second time? No! [SIZE=1]*As Tom Lehrer satirically noted, "It takes a certain amount of courage to get up in a coffee-house or a college auditorium and come out in favor of the things that everybody else in the audience is against - like peace and justice and brotherhood and so on."[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Google doodle
Top