Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ghostknight" data-source="post: 1856416" data-attributes="member: 15338">OOC:  He's a mage.  Of course he's got his own agenda!  The point is to try and gain advantage by doing favours or through direct barter <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Diamon looks at the Jerbiton mage.With the mage missing, surely there must be some way to have him declared either dead or dissapeared?  If not the covenant, in theory, could remain without a position filled for eternity if a member should die!  And if we should have no representative at Tribunal, that indeed would be for the worse!But I still find myself at odds with whether you reveal information for the betterment of the task, yourself or the covenant.  I also find myself asking why you would ask us, newly arrived at the covenant, to take sides in a council dispute, putting us at risk when we come forward to request materials for our our own usage.</blockquote>