Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SnowDog" data-source="post: 1245794" data-attributes="member: 2225">Background: I run a game for 2 players.&nbsp; All 3 of us own BotR, and the party &quot;tank&quot; is a Holy Warrior.&nbsp; We love BotR <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />.I think it was a huge selling point that the Holy Warrior could wholly reproduce the Paladin class.&nbsp; Any DM looking to get a group to switch to BotR didn't have to worry about any players with their hearts set on playing by-the-book Paladins.&nbsp; Likewise, a player could do the same with his or her DM.Unless you feel the 3.5E Paladin is broken, I think it's worth the effort to make the class able to reproduce the new Paladin.&nbsp; If you do feel the new Paladin is broken, I think a little document explaining that design decision might be worthwhile.Given all that, however, it won't impact my game one way or the other.&nbsp; Our group is quite content with the rules as they stand, even though we're playing with 3.5E.&nbsp; While we would be happy to see any sort of 3.5E touch-up, there's nothing you could do that would get us to stop using the Holy Warrior.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SnowDog, post: 1245794, member: 2225"] Background: I run a game for 2 players. All 3 of us own BotR, and the party "tank" is a Holy Warrior. We love BotR :). I think it was a huge selling point that the Holy Warrior could wholly reproduce the Paladin class. Any DM looking to get a group to switch to BotR didn't have to worry about any players with their hearts set on playing by-the-book Paladins. Likewise, a player could do the same with his or her DM. Unless you feel the 3.5E Paladin is broken, I think it's worth the effort to make the class able to reproduce the new Paladin. If you do feel the new Paladin is broken, I think a little document explaining that design decision might be worthwhile. Given all that, however, it won't impact my game one way or the other. Our group is quite content with the rules as they stand, even though we're playing with 3.5E. While we would be happy to see any sort of 3.5E touch-up, there's nothing you could do that would get us to stop using the Holy Warrior. [/QUOTE]

Verification