Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grabbing Items in Combat (HoNS Spoiler)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 329730" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>"Lightning Grab.</p><p>Prerequisites: Improved Initiative, Dex 15+</p><p>Benefit: You may take an item from any flatfooted opponent within 5 feet with a successful pick pocket check opposed by your opponents reflex save. You may take any item that you could normally carry, and may grab anything you can see on your opponent. For example, you coud take a dagger from an orc's belt sheath, but you could not take it if he had it out of sight in his belt pouch. Any item that could be freely picked up, without undoing bluckes or knots, is vulnerable to this feat."</p><p></p><p>That sound more like a manuever to me.</p><p></p><p>It would take a pretty hidebound DM to not allow this without the feat (for instance what is the 'normal' rule for handling this situation?), and a fairly ungenerous DM to not allow a pickpocket to use his skill rather than an attack roll. In theory, that's what pickpocket is for anyway, and all we've changed here is that he doesn't care if he's caught (which ought to make the roll that much easier).</p><p></p><p>a) A person who is flat footed has no threat zone, and thus cannot make a AoA</p><p></p><p>b) If you were attempting to disarm an opponent, then he could resist with an opposed roll. At the least, you could rule that taking a dagger from an opponent's sheath was a disarm. If you make an unarmed disarm, you are now holding the weapon (ei you grabbed it).</p><p></p><p>c) However, it seems reasonable that grabbing something that your opponent is not holding is easier than grabbing something that he is. I would rule that the only thing needed is a touch attack modified by the items size and possibly cover (if it is in the opinion of the DM behind the target relative to you). Since the target is both flat footed and not holding the item, I don't see why he gets an opposed roll.</p><p></p><p>d) Whether you wish to make a touch attack or a pick pocket check vs. DC 20, you still grab something successfully - feat or not.</p><p></p><p>Now if the feat let you do this without provoking an attack of opportunity, that might be more like a feat.</p><p></p><p>In this particular case, I'd say this was a unarmed disarm. Of course, you could grapple first and then attempt to wrestle it off (hopefully under more favorable circumstances), but eventually a disarm check is required. If you wanted to get particular, some helmets are probably like locked gauntlets (have straps, form fitting, etc.) and thus have a +10 bonus to staying on. On the other hand, one could rule that the helmet wearer had a non-proficiency penalty (-4) to resist since it is not a normal weapon and is not held like one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 329730, member: 4937"] "Lightning Grab. Prerequisites: Improved Initiative, Dex 15+ Benefit: You may take an item from any flatfooted opponent within 5 feet with a successful pick pocket check opposed by your opponents reflex save. You may take any item that you could normally carry, and may grab anything you can see on your opponent. For example, you coud take a dagger from an orc's belt sheath, but you could not take it if he had it out of sight in his belt pouch. Any item that could be freely picked up, without undoing bluckes or knots, is vulnerable to this feat." That sound more like a manuever to me. It would take a pretty hidebound DM to not allow this without the feat (for instance what is the 'normal' rule for handling this situation?), and a fairly ungenerous DM to not allow a pickpocket to use his skill rather than an attack roll. In theory, that's what pickpocket is for anyway, and all we've changed here is that he doesn't care if he's caught (which ought to make the roll that much easier). a) A person who is flat footed has no threat zone, and thus cannot make a AoA b) If you were attempting to disarm an opponent, then he could resist with an opposed roll. At the least, you could rule that taking a dagger from an opponent's sheath was a disarm. If you make an unarmed disarm, you are now holding the weapon (ei you grabbed it). c) However, it seems reasonable that grabbing something that your opponent is not holding is easier than grabbing something that he is. I would rule that the only thing needed is a touch attack modified by the items size and possibly cover (if it is in the opinion of the DM behind the target relative to you). Since the target is both flat footed and not holding the item, I don't see why he gets an opposed roll. d) Whether you wish to make a touch attack or a pick pocket check vs. DC 20, you still grab something successfully - feat or not. Now if the feat let you do this without provoking an attack of opportunity, that might be more like a feat. In this particular case, I'd say this was a unarmed disarm. Of course, you could grapple first and then attempt to wrestle it off (hopefully under more favorable circumstances), but eventually a disarm check is required. If you wanted to get particular, some helmets are probably like locked gauntlets (have straps, form fitting, etc.) and thus have a +10 bonus to staying on. On the other hand, one could rule that the helmet wearer had a non-proficiency penalty (-4) to resist since it is not a normal weapon and is not held like one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grabbing Items in Combat (HoNS Spoiler)
Top