Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Graduate School
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nakia" data-source="post: 2094902" data-attributes="member: 25747"><p>Sure! Well, let's discuss. I prefer that to argument.</p><p></p><p>If I understand your description of decision theory correctly, it primarily consists in listing your options on on axis and your important criteria on another axis, then assigning values to criteria for each option. Total up values, and that's what you should decide.</p><p></p><p>Questions:</p><p>1. Does the option with the highest value represent what you should decide or your actual decision? I'm thinking of the person who (in your example) scores prime rib the highest, then says "Screw it, I want Mexican!" Or, under decision theory, did they just make an error in assigning values?</p><p>2. What do those numerical values represent? Aren't they arbitrary? Is that a problem?</p><p>3. What about criteria that emerge during the course of inquiry? Are you asking to much in having all your relevant criteria for evlaution set from the start? Example: So, you decide on prime rib using your method above. As you pick up your keys to go out the door to drive to the prime rib place, you realize that the prime rib joint is all the way across town and you only have a quarter tank of gas. So, during the course of carrying out your decision, new and relevant criteria have emerged that complicate your choice. Do you now recompute? </p><p></p><p>I guess these questions boil down to two related questions about decision theory: what does it actually do and does it do that well?</p><p></p><p>Philosophy is fun. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nakia, post: 2094902, member: 25747"] Sure! Well, let's discuss. I prefer that to argument. If I understand your description of decision theory correctly, it primarily consists in listing your options on on axis and your important criteria on another axis, then assigning values to criteria for each option. Total up values, and that's what you should decide. Questions: 1. Does the option with the highest value represent what you should decide or your actual decision? I'm thinking of the person who (in your example) scores prime rib the highest, then says "Screw it, I want Mexican!" Or, under decision theory, did they just make an error in assigning values? 2. What do those numerical values represent? Aren't they arbitrary? Is that a problem? 3. What about criteria that emerge during the course of inquiry? Are you asking to much in having all your relevant criteria for evlaution set from the start? Example: So, you decide on prime rib using your method above. As you pick up your keys to go out the door to drive to the prime rib place, you realize that the prime rib joint is all the way across town and you only have a quarter tank of gas. So, during the course of carrying out your decision, new and relevant criteria have emerged that complicate your choice. Do you now recompute? I guess these questions boil down to two related questions about decision theory: what does it actually do and does it do that well? Philosophy is fun. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Graduate School
Top