Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grappling and Multiple Attacks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Prism" data-source="post: 1767197" data-attributes="member: 9501"><p>To sumarize some of the great points made by various people this is how I now see it</p><p></p><p><strong>Starts the round grappling</strong></p><p></p><p>A creature can only attack with 1 natural weapon due to the quotes from the rake ability and the main grapple rules</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>However with a full attack you are allowed mutiple grapple attempts based on your BAB and this includes creatures with natural attacks. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>They couldn't make more than 1 attack a round but they could use the other iterative attacks to perform other actions such as pin, escape, damage opponent, use opponents weapon or break anothers pin. None of these are actual attacks (they are grapple checks) and therefore are not limited by the normal rule of 1 attack only with each natural weapon</p><p></p><p><strong>Grapples an opponent part way through its attacks sequence</strong></p><p></p><p>The creature follows its normal full attack sequence until it grapples its opponent. At this point it is grappling and loses all remaining natural attacks. This is supported by the use of the -20 option which basically prevents the creature from being grappled itself</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>So if you can use your remaining attacks as a benefit when you take the -20 I can only assume you lose your remaining attacks when you don't. This would also support the quotes above which only allow 1 natural weapon when grappling. A giant octopus or such like with many attacks is probably best taking the -20 option here to keep its other attacks</p><p></p><p>I also believe that at this point the creature would get any iterative attacks based upon BAB to allow it to do additonal grapple actions, assuming it is in the middle of a full attack. </p><p></p><p><strong>Ending the grapple part way through the grapple sequence</strong></p><p></p><p>This could be because the opponent dies or is swallowed as an example. At this point the creature has only used 1 natural weapon in the round (possibly mutliple iterative grapples with it however) and therefore, now not being grappled anymore can use any remaining natural attacks as normal to attack other opponents - and possibly even grapple them</p><p></p><p><strong>Creature chooses to grapple with 1 part of its body</strong></p><p></p><p>The creatures gets iterative grapple attempts with its 1 body part and still gets its remaining attacks in addition. The -20 on the grapple checks makes this a pretty difficult option but probably worth it for multiattack creatures like the giant octopus or dragons</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Prism, post: 1767197, member: 9501"] To sumarize some of the great points made by various people this is how I now see it [B]Starts the round grappling[/B] A creature can only attack with 1 natural weapon due to the quotes from the rake ability and the main grapple rules However with a full attack you are allowed mutiple grapple attempts based on your BAB and this includes creatures with natural attacks. They couldn't make more than 1 attack a round but they could use the other iterative attacks to perform other actions such as pin, escape, damage opponent, use opponents weapon or break anothers pin. None of these are actual attacks (they are grapple checks) and therefore are not limited by the normal rule of 1 attack only with each natural weapon [B]Grapples an opponent part way through its attacks sequence[/B] The creature follows its normal full attack sequence until it grapples its opponent. At this point it is grappling and loses all remaining natural attacks. This is supported by the use of the -20 option which basically prevents the creature from being grappled itself So if you can use your remaining attacks as a benefit when you take the -20 I can only assume you lose your remaining attacks when you don't. This would also support the quotes above which only allow 1 natural weapon when grappling. A giant octopus or such like with many attacks is probably best taking the -20 option here to keep its other attacks I also believe that at this point the creature would get any iterative attacks based upon BAB to allow it to do additonal grapple actions, assuming it is in the middle of a full attack. [B]Ending the grapple part way through the grapple sequence[/B] This could be because the opponent dies or is swallowed as an example. At this point the creature has only used 1 natural weapon in the round (possibly mutliple iterative grapples with it however) and therefore, now not being grappled anymore can use any remaining natural attacks as normal to attack other opponents - and possibly even grapple them [B]Creature chooses to grapple with 1 part of its body[/B] The creatures gets iterative grapple attempts with its 1 body part and still gets its remaining attacks in addition. The -20 on the grapple checks makes this a pretty difficult option but probably worth it for multiattack creatures like the giant octopus or dragons [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grappling and Multiple Attacks
Top