Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7853284" data-attributes="member: 6987520">Using UA is no different than employing a house-rule.Well, honestly, I'd rather play 1E or 2E, but the group started with 5E so that is what we play. I tailor it to more meet what is appealing to me and sometimes I can convince the others, sometimes I don't.There is a lot of 5E I don't like, etc and so I avoid it. Bards and Battle Masters are two of the top ones. We played 5E completely RAW for the first five levels, so we could get a feel for it before we started making changes. Some changes have stuck, others we reverse back once we realize they don't work well with the rest of the 5E design. Think of it this way: we consider ourselves our own playtest group. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />And FYI, I get a fair number of private messages about how someone likes the rules and changes I suggest. I've had a number of people tell me they will steal an idea I've posted for their own group--and I am happy they like them.So, while I can appreciate the good nature of your comment, this is also the second time you've commented as such about my house-rules and comments. I even stated in my response that your suggestion "is a fine suggestion, certainly". The tone of your reply is starting to sound... unfriendly? Maybe I am just being a bit sensitive (it has been a LONG day for me...) so I hope I am mistaken.</blockquote>

Verification