Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grease spell confusion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LokiDR" data-source="post: 996824" data-attributes="member: 6239"><p>You can't argue against a house rule. "I say fireball lights things on fire." In that game, it does. </p><p></p><p>But if some person says "you can't move yourself with the telekinisis spell, because the spell doesn't say you can, that is what fly is for" I am going to be pissed. If something says it creates paper, I will assume normal paper. As a player, I have to make basic assumption about the world because the DM can't spell out everything. A good starting assumption is that anything created by magic will act like a normal item unless stated otherwise. Hence, grease (as understood in a fantasy setting) would burn. I can't make any assumption about how well, but I can assume it will burn in some way.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Can you think of any non-burnable grease that does fit setting? If you can, I might just change my opinion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Naw, that defination doesn't give you flash points or the temperature of the average flame. Those would be more important, but the definition doesn't give those. Besides, OSHA is just there to make companies sweat. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>A medieval torch is a stick, wrapped in cloth soaked in oil. That is going to burn pretty hot. I am almost tempted to try this now. (mmm, fire.....)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think a DM that says "it says it creates grease, but that isn't real grease" is reading beyond the spell and house ruling. A DM that says "Ok, the furnace flares for a second and then dies down again dealing no extra damage" is keeping the "realism" without letting the players get an undue advantage. It doesn't have to be a good tatic to suit me, it just has to do something.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have to make some assumption. Given the material, I would have to say it would burn since that is what "normal" grease would do. This doesn't mean much other than it will produce flame if very hot. It might be anything from a great fire trap to a rather crappy flare.</p><p></p><p>Players expectation should be that the world works a specific way, normally like ours. As a DM, we have to maintain that effect. So, anytime something isn't stated, whatever would be logical for the situation should be the default. By default, grease in a medieval setting burns.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If it is something other than normal grease, the spell should state that. I should be able to assume, for example, that a mount from the spell can eat and isn't some obvious construct. If you want to change that, it is house rule. Normal unless stated otherwise.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Crude oil qualifies as an oily substance, in accord with the general definition that someone posted.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We aren't talking about a helpless person. And I don't think 6 seconds of a blowtorch would kill a person. It will hurt them, but it is no 5d6.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that was a quote of some pyro character somewhere. Not important.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Good, because I am not really fluent in 133t and would hate to have to learn it just for this. I am only fluent in english, c++, php, and mispelled englsh. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LokiDR, post: 996824, member: 6239"] You can't argue against a house rule. "I say fireball lights things on fire." In that game, it does. But if some person says "you can't move yourself with the telekinisis spell, because the spell doesn't say you can, that is what fly is for" I am going to be pissed. If something says it creates paper, I will assume normal paper. As a player, I have to make basic assumption about the world because the DM can't spell out everything. A good starting assumption is that anything created by magic will act like a normal item unless stated otherwise. Hence, grease (as understood in a fantasy setting) would burn. I can't make any assumption about how well, but I can assume it will burn in some way. Can you think of any non-burnable grease that does fit setting? If you can, I might just change my opinion :) Naw, that defination doesn't give you flash points or the temperature of the average flame. Those would be more important, but the definition doesn't give those. Besides, OSHA is just there to make companies sweat. :) A medieval torch is a stick, wrapped in cloth soaked in oil. That is going to burn pretty hot. I am almost tempted to try this now. (mmm, fire.....) I think a DM that says "it says it creates grease, but that isn't real grease" is reading beyond the spell and house ruling. A DM that says "Ok, the furnace flares for a second and then dies down again dealing no extra damage" is keeping the "realism" without letting the players get an undue advantage. It doesn't have to be a good tatic to suit me, it just has to do something. I have to make some assumption. Given the material, I would have to say it would burn since that is what "normal" grease would do. This doesn't mean much other than it will produce flame if very hot. It might be anything from a great fire trap to a rather crappy flare. Players expectation should be that the world works a specific way, normally like ours. As a DM, we have to maintain that effect. So, anytime something isn't stated, whatever would be logical for the situation should be the default. By default, grease in a medieval setting burns. If it is something other than normal grease, the spell should state that. I should be able to assume, for example, that a mount from the spell can eat and isn't some obvious construct. If you want to change that, it is house rule. Normal unless stated otherwise. Crude oil qualifies as an oily substance, in accord with the general definition that someone posted. We aren't talking about a helpless person. And I don't think 6 seconds of a blowtorch would kill a person. It will hurt them, but it is no 5d6. I think that was a quote of some pyro character somewhere. Not important. Good, because I am not really fluent in 133t and would hate to have to learn it just for this. I am only fluent in english, c++, php, and mispelled englsh. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Grease spell confusion
Top