Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4371040" data-attributes="member: 710">Misunderstanding what you say isn't either. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />But to expand on it: We also know that there are 3E fans that don't like the Pathfinder changes. Because they make using older material harder. That's of course a very subjective statement. But how many people still used Masters of the Wild after 3.5 appeared. How many after the Complete Divine appeared? The classes were nearly useable as-is, and still I found very few people that "trusted" those books enough to continue using them with 3.5. One big advantage of WotC is that their fans are attracted to the new shiny. The freshness, clarity and ease of use of 4E rules is a plus. But WotC fans also know they love what the WotC designers have put out in the past, and they have been for many years now. The big advantage of Paizo is that they have fans. The big advantage of WotC is that they have fans.</blockquote>