Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="enrious" data-source="post: 96180" data-attributes="member: 2126">Thanks.  I'd like to point out that I don't think it's just me.  I probably spent more time in thinking about the character but the others are developing thier personalities.  The Tymoran cleric is a fun loving gambler while the aasimar is an aloof person.I think the accolades are just because I'm the one posting. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />IIRC, the aasimar made mention of Shaundakal but the paladin has no knowledge of ranger's patron requirement nor of the ranger's patron.Besides, FRCS p.26 states that FR rangers don't have to choose a patron until lvl 4, which is a long way away.  While most choose before then, they aren't required to - and I have no idea one way or the other if he has.Interesting idea and quite likely something that the paladin would consider.  Of course, in a meta-gaming sense if Kelemvor would grant such a boon then there would be the underlying feeling in the aasimar's player that the DM ganged up against him.Besides, the paladin believes that the aasimar should give the whistle up on his own free will - it's possible (given the aasimar's independant nature) that he would consider such an boon to be cheating.  Why couldn't everyone be LG? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Well, the paladin did attack the one zombie that was summoned but he's more concerned with more being summoned.I fear that should the aasimar chose to use the whistle again it may be more logical to attack the aasimar - I'm not sure that the paladin would be completely logical and rational when dealing with such a situation.Hmm, interesting.The MM description says that skeletons are always Neutral.The PH lists modifiers for undead.My DM (and I were I the DM) would rule that the PH modifier would only count if the undead in question were Evil - it would not apply to Neutral undead.The spell has a requirement of sorts - Evil present.  If the Undead does not present Evil, then that requirement is not met thus Neutral undead would not register.N Undead - no detection.E Undead - radiate more evil than alive Evil.At least, in our campaign.</blockquote>

Verification