Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Great weapon fighter is a "trap"? Forked Thread: I don't optimize.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="firesnakearies" data-source="post: 4398460" data-attributes="member: 71334"><p>I don't have a problem with "optimizing" (as we call it these days) per se. I really don't. I, myself, am an oldschool powergamer and rules lawyer who has always loved to really dig into the mechanics and figure out how to construct highly combat-effective characters.</p><p> </p><p>However, I'm a roleplayer before that. My friends and I back in the day had a slogan about character creation, "Build 'em like a powergamer, but play 'em like a roleplayer." The premise which I've always embodied in my gaming career is that you can create a fairly min/maxed character and still imbue that character with plenty of background, personality, and other RP goodness.</p><p> </p><p>What I do have a problem with is the level, amount, and tone of the <em>communication</em> about the subject by the hardcore "optimizer" crowd. Partially, I blame the massive growth and popularization of the Internet, online communities, and vast amounts of forum discourse on every possible subject for this. But mostly, I blame the rise of MMORPGs, especially the elements of intense competitive PvP and extremely challenging raid content. I think that these factors engendered a change in the entire set of expectations, presuppositions, and ways of communicating about RP gaming.</p><p> </p><p>It comes down to what I'm going to call "powergaming proselytization". (New term coined, right here and now!) It's no longer enough for the min/maxers to quietly go about making their uber character, not announcing the fact, not showing off their optimized build, and not presuming for a moment to tell anyone else how to make their own character. Now, the powergamers feel compelled to widely trumpet their ideas and formulae for the "ultimate" character, for maximal "efficiency" and so forth. Worse, they very often decide that it's their duty to "inform" any other gamer who is not so "optimal", to tell them how to build their character, to criticize and deride the "subpar" choices that their fellows have made, and to essentially browbeat everyone else into playing in whatever they feel is the "right" way.</p><p> </p><p>They're proselytizers, beating the gospel of powergaming truth into the thick skulls of the ignorant heathens who still just want to make a fun, if mediocre, character that they'll enjoy playing. They want to <em>convert</em> everyone else who plays with them, or who they discuss the game with, into fellow min/maxers, and they can be downright pushy, even rude. The problem is that newer gamers, or more casual ones, or more roleplay-focused ones, get bombarded with all of this stentorian advice (and ridicule if that advice isn't heeded), so that either sets their own perceptions of how they "should" be playing, or it makes them uncomfortable playing alongside someone who can't help but suggest (repeatedly) that they're a bad player, or a useless character, or what have you.</p><p> </p><p>This is dragging down the hobby as a whole, causing a lot of arguments, a lot of conflict, a lot of <em>misinformation</em>, and a lot of corruption of newer players' baseline views of the game and what it's ultimately about. I can tell you that the next time I'm running a game for a new group and Mr. Optimizer looks over Ms. Newgirl's character sheet and starts rattling off all of the things which are "wrong" and "useless" and telling her how she SHOULD build her character, and suppressing her natural creative inclinations under the fallacious pretense that she "needs" to play a certain way, and make her character as "efficient" as possible . . . the next time I see that happening, I'll be putting the kibosh on that <em>right</em> away.</p><p> </p><p>I don't want people to abandon "optimizing" if that's how they like to play. But I do want them to stop shoving it down everyone else's throat. I do want them to quiet down about their ultimate gems of min/maxing wisdom a little bit, and stop shouting down every other player with their intimidating claims about what is absolutely "right", "best", "necessary" or "viable" - in their personal opinion.</p><p> </p><p>I just want to see less <em>powergaming proselytization </em>going on, and more friendly, respectful, open-minded gameplay, cooperation, and discussion.</p><p> </p><p>That's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="firesnakearies, post: 4398460, member: 71334"] I don't have a problem with "optimizing" (as we call it these days) per se. I really don't. I, myself, am an oldschool powergamer and rules lawyer who has always loved to really dig into the mechanics and figure out how to construct highly combat-effective characters. However, I'm a roleplayer before that. My friends and I back in the day had a slogan about character creation, "Build 'em like a powergamer, but play 'em like a roleplayer." The premise which I've always embodied in my gaming career is that you can create a fairly min/maxed character and still imbue that character with plenty of background, personality, and other RP goodness. What I do have a problem with is the level, amount, and tone of the [I]communication[/I] about the subject by the hardcore "optimizer" crowd. Partially, I blame the massive growth and popularization of the Internet, online communities, and vast amounts of forum discourse on every possible subject for this. But mostly, I blame the rise of MMORPGs, especially the elements of intense competitive PvP and extremely challenging raid content. I think that these factors engendered a change in the entire set of expectations, presuppositions, and ways of communicating about RP gaming. It comes down to what I'm going to call "powergaming proselytization". (New term coined, right here and now!) It's no longer enough for the min/maxers to quietly go about making their uber character, not announcing the fact, not showing off their optimized build, and not presuming for a moment to tell anyone else how to make their own character. Now, the powergamers feel compelled to widely trumpet their ideas and formulae for the "ultimate" character, for maximal "efficiency" and so forth. Worse, they very often decide that it's their duty to "inform" any other gamer who is not so "optimal", to tell them how to build their character, to criticize and deride the "subpar" choices that their fellows have made, and to essentially browbeat everyone else into playing in whatever they feel is the "right" way. They're proselytizers, beating the gospel of powergaming truth into the thick skulls of the ignorant heathens who still just want to make a fun, if mediocre, character that they'll enjoy playing. They want to [I]convert[/I] everyone else who plays with them, or who they discuss the game with, into fellow min/maxers, and they can be downright pushy, even rude. The problem is that newer gamers, or more casual ones, or more roleplay-focused ones, get bombarded with all of this stentorian advice (and ridicule if that advice isn't heeded), so that either sets their own perceptions of how they "should" be playing, or it makes them uncomfortable playing alongside someone who can't help but suggest (repeatedly) that they're a bad player, or a useless character, or what have you. This is dragging down the hobby as a whole, causing a lot of arguments, a lot of conflict, a lot of [I]misinformation[/I], and a lot of corruption of newer players' baseline views of the game and what it's ultimately about. I can tell you that the next time I'm running a game for a new group and Mr. Optimizer looks over Ms. Newgirl's character sheet and starts rattling off all of the things which are "wrong" and "useless" and telling her how she SHOULD build her character, and suppressing her natural creative inclinations under the fallacious pretense that she "needs" to play a certain way, and make her character as "efficient" as possible . . . the next time I see that happening, I'll be putting the kibosh on that [I]right[/I] away. I don't want people to abandon "optimizing" if that's how they like to play. But I do want them to stop shoving it down everyone else's throat. I do want them to quiet down about their ultimate gems of min/maxing wisdom a little bit, and stop shouting down every other player with their intimidating claims about what is absolutely "right", "best", "necessary" or "viable" - in their personal opinion. I just want to see less [I]powergaming proselytization [/I]going on, and more friendly, respectful, open-minded gameplay, cooperation, and discussion. That's all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Great weapon fighter is a "trap"? Forked Thread: I don't optimize.
Top