Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Great Weapon Mastery - once more into the breach! (with math)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 7198456" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>Of course you're right in there. But an ASI is always useful. GWM not always.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course they don't. Where would be the fun in that? The feat is there for something and it should stay relevant all game long. Not all enemies need a high AC. Only the front liners. Just like the players. Monsters can have their tank too you know?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would I do such a thing with every orogs? Variation is what makes D&D a great game. Monster stats are not fixed for all eternity. Monsters adapts, changes and can use shields or not. Maybe some of them have heavy crossbows. Maybe they have poisoned arrows? It all depends on what you feel about what you have to do to make the game interesting and the type of group that you have.</p><p></p><p>The whole point was not: Boost all monsters AC and you'll have no problems.</p><p>The point is: Make some changes once in while. Make the players sweat without going all out against only one type of play. Force your players to review their tactics every now and then. You will suddenly notice that some feats are making some strange appearences, like the sentinel feat or the shield master feat...</p><p></p><p>My point is still valid. These feats are as Over Powered as you let them to be. Not all orcs encounters need to be the same. You meet 12 orogs. Are they all standard? Are there some orc veterans among them? Could there be a priestess of Luthic hidden among them? Maybe there are one or two orogs veterans (use veteran stats, gladiator?) who knows? With many DM, it will be 12 normal orogs period. That is where some feat comes in with their big shoes. The more predictable an encounter is, the more these feats will look unbalanced.</p><p></p><p>Enemies retreating behind a corner to negate a sharp shooter isn't that hard to do. No modifications are required on the monsters stats to do that. Two front row hobgoblins using the defense options while their friends shoot the GWM down, or the GWM friends is also quite an acceptable tactic. It is also a nice way to negate any advantages the pc might had.</p><p></p><p>No, I don't feel compel to shut down the feat with artificial means since I see no problems with the feat. I just use some different tactics than what is written in the monster block to push the players to their limit. </p><p></p><p>In one battle the GWM will be cleaving through the enemies like a hot knife in butter, the next, he will struggle to simply get a hit. That is where the warlock/wizard/sorcerer will come in and say:"Fireball, anyone?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 7198456, member: 6855114"] Of course you're right in there. But an ASI is always useful. GWM not always. Of course they don't. Where would be the fun in that? The feat is there for something and it should stay relevant all game long. Not all enemies need a high AC. Only the front liners. Just like the players. Monsters can have their tank too you know? Why would I do such a thing with every orogs? Variation is what makes D&D a great game. Monster stats are not fixed for all eternity. Monsters adapts, changes and can use shields or not. Maybe some of them have heavy crossbows. Maybe they have poisoned arrows? It all depends on what you feel about what you have to do to make the game interesting and the type of group that you have. The whole point was not: Boost all monsters AC and you'll have no problems. The point is: Make some changes once in while. Make the players sweat without going all out against only one type of play. Force your players to review their tactics every now and then. You will suddenly notice that some feats are making some strange appearences, like the sentinel feat or the shield master feat... My point is still valid. These feats are as Over Powered as you let them to be. Not all orcs encounters need to be the same. You meet 12 orogs. Are they all standard? Are there some orc veterans among them? Could there be a priestess of Luthic hidden among them? Maybe there are one or two orogs veterans (use veteran stats, gladiator?) who knows? With many DM, it will be 12 normal orogs period. That is where some feat comes in with their big shoes. The more predictable an encounter is, the more these feats will look unbalanced. Enemies retreating behind a corner to negate a sharp shooter isn't that hard to do. No modifications are required on the monsters stats to do that. Two front row hobgoblins using the defense options while their friends shoot the GWM down, or the GWM friends is also quite an acceptable tactic. It is also a nice way to negate any advantages the pc might had. No, I don't feel compel to shut down the feat with artificial means since I see no problems with the feat. I just use some different tactics than what is written in the monster block to push the players to their limit. In one battle the GWM will be cleaving through the enemies like a hot knife in butter, the next, he will struggle to simply get a hit. That is where the warlock/wizard/sorcerer will come in and say:"Fireball, anyone?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Great Weapon Mastery - once more into the breach! (with math)
Top