Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Greatsword weilding caster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 2809952" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>No. It consumes the <strong>entirety of that PC's turn in the initiative</strong>. At the end of that full-round action, the spell is cast, and the PC can take a 5-foot step if they so choose. Once we move on to the next character in the initiative order, the caster PC isn't doing anything that prevents them from making AoO's.</p><p></p><p>This is no different from a fighter making a full attack. Once they are done with the full-round action of making multiple attacks, they are free to make AoO's. They are not occupied with making their full attack throughout the rest of the round while other characters' are taking their turns. Everything happens on their turn. Unless you're ruling that making a full attack negates a character's ability to make AoO's, which is in no way supported by the rules.</p><p></p><p>A spell with a casting time of <strong>1 round</strong>, however, doesn't take effect until the beginning of the caster's <strong>next</strong> turn in the initiative. Until that time, the caster is occupied with the casting process, and cannot make AoO's.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you read the whole of the section in the DMG on "Simultaneous Activity", p.24, you'll notice the part that says: "However, when everyone at the table plays out a combat round, <strong>each individual acts in turn according to the initiative count for his character</strong>. Obviously, this is necessary, because if every indidivual took his turn at the same time, <strong>mass confusion would result</strong>."</p><p></p><p>You should also note the following:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>AoO's, I should add, are not listed on the "Actions in Combat" table on p.141 of the PHB. As stated above, they interrupt the normal flow.</p><p></p><p>There is a "rest of the round". What PC A does on his turn happens <strong>on that initiative count</strong>. Unless they are taking an action or suffering a condition that specifically prevents them from acting past their turn in the initiative order or prevents them from threatening, they are free to make AoO's.</p><p></p><p></p><p>There's no call for snarkiness. I've read the thread; pardon me if I missed that bit.</p><p></p><p>So, you're going to make a sorcerer blow a feat on an ability that has almost no utility for them in order to let them use the RAW? I don't find that fair to the PC. </p><p></p><p>I don't see any part of the rules that supports your interpretation. If you can cite someting, please feel free.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 2809952, member: 6777"] No. It consumes the [b]entirety of that PC's turn in the initiative[/b]. At the end of that full-round action, the spell is cast, and the PC can take a 5-foot step if they so choose. Once we move on to the next character in the initiative order, the caster PC isn't doing anything that prevents them from making AoO's. This is no different from a fighter making a full attack. Once they are done with the full-round action of making multiple attacks, they are free to make AoO's. They are not occupied with making their full attack throughout the rest of the round while other characters' are taking their turns. Everything happens on their turn. Unless you're ruling that making a full attack negates a character's ability to make AoO's, which is in no way supported by the rules. A spell with a casting time of [b]1 round[/b], however, doesn't take effect until the beginning of the caster's [b]next[/b] turn in the initiative. Until that time, the caster is occupied with the casting process, and cannot make AoO's. If you read the whole of the section in the DMG on "Simultaneous Activity", p.24, you'll notice the part that says: "However, when everyone at the table plays out a combat round, [b]each individual acts in turn according to the initiative count for his character[/b]. Obviously, this is necessary, because if every indidivual took his turn at the same time, [b]mass confusion would result[/b]." You should also note the following: AoO's, I should add, are not listed on the "Actions in Combat" table on p.141 of the PHB. As stated above, they interrupt the normal flow. There is a "rest of the round". What PC A does on his turn happens [b]on that initiative count[/b]. Unless they are taking an action or suffering a condition that specifically prevents them from acting past their turn in the initiative order or prevents them from threatening, they are free to make AoO's. There's no call for snarkiness. I've read the thread; pardon me if I missed that bit. So, you're going to make a sorcerer blow a feat on an ability that has almost no utility for them in order to let them use the RAW? I don't find that fair to the PC. I don't see any part of the rules that supports your interpretation. If you can cite someting, please feel free. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Greatsword weilding caster
Top