Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ASEO" data-source="post: 2013914" data-attributes="member: 12224">I have no problem with people having different opinions than I do on products.  I do have a problem with a review that completely glosses over an obvious flaw in the book.  I also believe that should a person not realize a flaw or gloss over a flaw for some reason, that it is proper to post a comment on the review making those flaws known.  As you see from my comment, I too encourage others to read a variety of reviews.  Had Bruce's review said "Sure it had flaws with the D20 rules, but I was able to work around them and thus decided to give the product a 5" then I would have been fine with it.  But to write an obviously incomplete review and post it as a staff reviewer hurts the credibility of all people who use the d20 Magazine Rack reviewer name.Are there no bad products out there? 239 reviews and only 3 below average?It also begs the question: Is the reviewer trustworthy?  Why aren't they posting comprehensive reviews?Do your reviewers get free copies from companies to review, or do they buy the books themselves?If there is anybody that believes this book is not flawed please make your case and explain all the flaws that have been pointed out.ASEO out</blockquote>