Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Belen" data-source="post: 4382898" data-attributes="member: 1405">I think you wildly overestimate the ability of GR to work anything out with Wizards.&nbsp; Wizards has not reason to work with such a tiny company.&nbsp; If they had wanted to work with any of the third party companies, then they had a year to formalize any deals.&nbsp; Wizards was talking to them.&nbsp; The fact that the GSL was such a shock to them shows that Wizards did not take their advice.They did attempt to work with Wizards.&nbsp; Wizards, however, did what they wanted to anyway.&nbsp; There is absolutely no indication that they would work with anyone on modifying the terms of the GSL.So, you should be asking why Wizards was not willing to go to bat for its fans by working with third party companies on a license that would be palatable to anyone other than themselves.Wizards got the exact response that they wanted and they managed to delay an entire development cycle while the third party companies waited on the GSL.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Belen, post: 4382898, member: 1405"] I think you wildly overestimate the ability of GR to work anything out with Wizards. Wizards has not reason to work with such a tiny company. If they had wanted to work with any of the third party companies, then they had a year to formalize any deals. Wizards was talking to them. The fact that the GSL was such a shock to them shows that Wizards did not take their advice. They did attempt to work with Wizards. Wizards, however, did what they wanted to anyway. There is absolutely no indication that they would work with anyone on modifying the terms of the GSL. So, you should be asking why Wizards was not willing to go to bat for its fans by working with third party companies on a license that would be palatable to anyone other than themselves. Wizards got the exact response that they wanted and they managed to delay an entire development cycle while the third party companies waited on the GSL. [/QUOTE]

Verification