Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Green Ronin not signing GSL (Forked Thread: Doing the GSL. Who?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Turjan" data-source="post: 4387489" data-attributes="member: 3477"><p>Honestly, I don't think that WoTC care one way or the other. The wording of the GSL is such as to discourage any company from steering to near to the production plans of core D&D itself and being able to kill any product off that does so. The only GSL product I know of so far illustrates this: the <a href="http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/home/detail.php?qsID=1617" target="_blank">announced Mongoose book</a> is pretty far removed from stuff you would expect to come from WotC, while at the same time working with the PHB.</p><p></p><p>Even if Charles Ryan repeated the story about the d20 glut that was bad for D&D and that the d20 companies didn't produce the right product to support D&D, I don't think this is true in the way he says this. Let's just look at the argument that the 3rd party companies didn't produce any adventures, as they were supposed to do. It's very easy to see that this argument doesn't hold any water. Even if we exclude the Dungeon magazine as official D&D product, we had at least two full lines of D&D aventures from Necromancer and Goodman Games at that time. The problem was not that nobody produced adventures, but that most WotC customers did not buy anything that didn't come from WotC at that point in the development.</p><p></p><p>Which means that the glut argument works somewhat indirectly. When WotC went back to publishing adventures themselves, the d20 market for direct D&D supplements had already mostly killed itself. At this point, only well-informed people bought quality 3rd party D&D supplements, and you cannot live on the dedicated internet crowd alone.</p><p></p><p>I can understand that some people at WotC think nowadays that any open gaming segment doesn't really contribute much to their bottom line, one way or the other. But, in the end, the GSL seems to indicate that WotC want to keep the major supplement train for themselves and leave only exotic topics to others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Turjan, post: 4387489, member: 3477"] Honestly, I don't think that WoTC care one way or the other. The wording of the GSL is such as to discourage any company from steering to near to the production plans of core D&D itself and being able to kill any product off that does so. The only GSL product I know of so far illustrates this: the [url=http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/home/detail.php?qsID=1617]announced Mongoose book[/url] is pretty far removed from stuff you would expect to come from WotC, while at the same time working with the PHB. Even if Charles Ryan repeated the story about the d20 glut that was bad for D&D and that the d20 companies didn't produce the right product to support D&D, I don't think this is true in the way he says this. Let's just look at the argument that the 3rd party companies didn't produce any adventures, as they were supposed to do. It's very easy to see that this argument doesn't hold any water. Even if we exclude the Dungeon magazine as official D&D product, we had at least two full lines of D&D aventures from Necromancer and Goodman Games at that time. The problem was not that nobody produced adventures, but that most WotC customers did not buy anything that didn't come from WotC at that point in the development. Which means that the glut argument works somewhat indirectly. When WotC went back to publishing adventures themselves, the d20 market for direct D&D supplements had already mostly killed itself. At this point, only well-informed people bought quality 3rd party D&D supplements, and you cannot live on the dedicated internet crowd alone. I can understand that some people at WotC think nowadays that any open gaming segment doesn't really contribute much to their bottom line, one way or the other. But, in the end, the GSL seems to indicate that WotC want to keep the major supplement train for themselves and leave only exotic topics to others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Green Ronin not signing GSL (Forked Thread: Doing the GSL. Who?)
Top