Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greg Leeds talks about D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MechaPilot" data-source="post: 6764058" data-attributes="member: 82779"><p>If the player is purchasing the book as a collector, or to use later when it's that player's turn to DM, then whether the player's current DM looks at it is irrelevant. DM review is also irrelevant if the player wants to use the book to get ideas for her characters; ideas can be mined from anywhere. The only part that's relevant to the DM reviewing the material is if the player wants to use that book in her current DM's game. If that is the reason the player is buying the book, then buying it without checking with the DM first is a mistake, and hopefully the player kept her receipt.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone is free to be a jerk. However, saying "no" doesn't make the DM a jerk. If the DM had not informed the player of the source limitations beforehand, then that's a separate issue. Also, it just flat out doesn't matter what a player had to do to get her hands on a book. There is no more or less deference owed if the player A) simply bought it in a normal transaction, or B) had to scour several bookstores, used book ads, and online sites to find the book. What a person is willing to do or pay to own something is on that person and that person alone.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, you framed it a liiittle differently in your previous post. The way you framed it before made it seem as if the DM owed the player a look at the material simply because the player spent money on it. No DM owes any player a look at anything just because the player bought it. If a player feels that $20-$40 is a significant expense, and if that player is buying the book specifically to use the options therein in her current DM's game, then checking with the DM first only makes good sense. If the DM doesn't know what's in the book, the DM can go to the store with the player and they can look at it together. The DM can also talk with other DMs she knows (and hopefully trusts/respects) to find out their opinion on the material. She can also go on forums like this and ask other DMs what they think to try to see if there is a general consensus.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MechaPilot, post: 6764058, member: 82779"] If the player is purchasing the book as a collector, or to use later when it's that player's turn to DM, then whether the player's current DM looks at it is irrelevant. DM review is also irrelevant if the player wants to use the book to get ideas for her characters; ideas can be mined from anywhere. The only part that's relevant to the DM reviewing the material is if the player wants to use that book in her current DM's game. If that is the reason the player is buying the book, then buying it without checking with the DM first is a mistake, and hopefully the player kept her receipt. Everyone is free to be a jerk. However, saying "no" doesn't make the DM a jerk. If the DM had not informed the player of the source limitations beforehand, then that's a separate issue. Also, it just flat out doesn't matter what a player had to do to get her hands on a book. There is no more or less deference owed if the player A) simply bought it in a normal transaction, or B) had to scour several bookstores, used book ads, and online sites to find the book. What a person is willing to do or pay to own something is on that person and that person alone. Yeah, you framed it a liiittle differently in your previous post. The way you framed it before made it seem as if the DM owed the player a look at the material simply because the player spent money on it. No DM owes any player a look at anything just because the player bought it. If a player feels that $20-$40 is a significant expense, and if that player is buying the book specifically to use the options therein in her current DM's game, then checking with the DM first only makes good sense. If the DM doesn't know what's in the book, the DM can go to the store with the player and they can look at it together. The DM can also talk with other DMs she knows (and hopefully trusts/respects) to find out their opinion on the material. She can also go on forums like this and ask other DMs what they think to try to see if there is a general consensus. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greg Leeds talks about D&D
Top