Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Reynard" data-source="post: 9344124" data-attributes="member: 467">From another thread:Emphasis mineSo, I was very, very wrong. I was sure they would have created something new with appeal directed at GenZ players. Not the first time I have been wrong. Oh well.But, I am curious why. Why Greyhawk? I mean, sure, 50th anniversary, but is that all? What does Greyhawk have about it that makes it a good fit for the vast majority of current and potential future players who have never known GH?For the record, I am a GenXer who grew up with BECMI and 2E. I never played in Greyhawk, but I was aware of it because of Dragon Magazine mostly. Until Eberron appeared with 3.5, the only setting I used with an depth or regularity was Krynn/Dragonlance. We played in &quot;The Known World&quot; but never got more in depth than what was in the Expert book.Anyway: why do YOU think they decided on Greyhawk for the example DMG setting?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Reynard, post: 9344124, member: 467"] From another thread: Emphasis mine So, I was very, very wrong. I was sure they would have created something new with appeal directed at GenZ players. Not the first time I have been wrong. Oh well. But, I am curious why. Why Greyhawk? I mean, sure, 50th anniversary, but is that all? What does Greyhawk have about it that makes it a good fit for the vast majority of current and potential future players who have never known GH? For the record, I am a GenXer who grew up with BECMI and 2E. I never played in Greyhawk, but I was aware of it because of Dragon Magazine mostly. Until Eberron appeared with 3.5, the only setting I used with an depth or regularity was Krynn/Dragonlance. We played in "The Known World" but never got more in depth than what was in the Expert book. Anyway: why do YOU think they decided on Greyhawk for the example DMG setting? [/QUOTE]

Verification