Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greyhawk Confirmed. Tell Me Why.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9351213" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>I must have missed your point then, because "we don't know what it will look like" seems to be a pretty solid defense against some of the things you are worried about.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah, another advantage I forgot. Since there are going to be multiple editors going over the chapter, having a single, solid concept with clearly defined edges is much easier. I've tried world-building with a team, it gets messy fast.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This doesn't make sense to me. People who are going to compare their homebrew to official settings are going to do so anyways. I have never read a world-building chapter in the DMG focused on Greyhawk... but I compare my work to Eberron constantly. Or to settings from fantasy novels. Also, you think a new setting made by professional game designers and creatives won't STILL cause people to look at their own work and feel inadequate? It will, trust me. </p><p></p><p>And sure, there are going to be people intimidated by the scale of a setting that needs an encyclopedia. Trust me, I am painfully aware of that. But, if they already know about the Forgotten Realms, showing them Fosal the new setting TM isn't going to make them less intimidated by the Realms. After all, we are talking about a setting chapter focused on Greyhawk, and the Realms causing a problem, which is the same problem that will be had regardless of the setting in the chapter. </p><p></p><p>Now, this isn't to say that the chapter shouldn't include things like "every first draft sucks, it is okay" or "even the greatest settings started with a single page of notes, size comes with time, don't stress about it". Those are great things to include and I would relish their inclusion... but I don't understand why you think the chapter focusing on Greyhawk means it cannot do that, but if they made Bodal the new setting TM they can totally say those things. I think you are feeling more like this chapter is going to be "look at Greyhawk, the wonderful setting" and less "here is how to world-build using examples" and I don't get why you think that is the case.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but WoTC is also completely correct in the assumption that this example world-building chapter is going to be used whole-cloth by DMs and players. Remember, the DMG from 2014 had a chapter on making your own race, and used the Eladrin as a demonstration... and very very few people made new races, and a lot of people used the Eladrin was written with no changes. </p><p></p><p>So, since we know players will use this chapter whole cloth, it has to have room for the standard lore, because it would be rather silly of them to make a setting that they expect new people to use, that conflicts with the lore from the monster or player books. </p><p></p><p>Is it still a good sidebar? Of course it is. But the point wasn't about sidebars, it was about how the setting would be made.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9351213, member: 6801228"] I must have missed your point then, because "we don't know what it will look like" seems to be a pretty solid defense against some of the things you are worried about. Ah, another advantage I forgot. Since there are going to be multiple editors going over the chapter, having a single, solid concept with clearly defined edges is much easier. I've tried world-building with a team, it gets messy fast. This doesn't make sense to me. People who are going to compare their homebrew to official settings are going to do so anyways. I have never read a world-building chapter in the DMG focused on Greyhawk... but I compare my work to Eberron constantly. Or to settings from fantasy novels. Also, you think a new setting made by professional game designers and creatives won't STILL cause people to look at their own work and feel inadequate? It will, trust me. And sure, there are going to be people intimidated by the scale of a setting that needs an encyclopedia. Trust me, I am painfully aware of that. But, if they already know about the Forgotten Realms, showing them Fosal the new setting TM isn't going to make them less intimidated by the Realms. After all, we are talking about a setting chapter focused on Greyhawk, and the Realms causing a problem, which is the same problem that will be had regardless of the setting in the chapter. Now, this isn't to say that the chapter shouldn't include things like "every first draft sucks, it is okay" or "even the greatest settings started with a single page of notes, size comes with time, don't stress about it". Those are great things to include and I would relish their inclusion... but I don't understand why you think the chapter focusing on Greyhawk means it cannot do that, but if they made Bodal the new setting TM they can totally say those things. I think you are feeling more like this chapter is going to be "look at Greyhawk, the wonderful setting" and less "here is how to world-build using examples" and I don't get why you think that is the case. Sure, but WoTC is also completely correct in the assumption that this example world-building chapter is going to be used whole-cloth by DMs and players. Remember, the DMG from 2014 had a chapter on making your own race, and used the Eladrin as a demonstration... and very very few people made new races, and a lot of people used the Eladrin was written with no changes. So, since we know players will use this chapter whole cloth, it has to have room for the standard lore, because it would be rather silly of them to make a setting that they expect new people to use, that conflicts with the lore from the monster or player books. Is it still a good sidebar? Of course it is. But the point wasn't about sidebars, it was about how the setting would be made. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greyhawk Confirmed. Tell Me Why.
Top