Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9356342" data-attributes="member: 6801228">Baseline assumptions like... what? Tieflings, Dragonborn and Goliaths? We have show repeatedly that Greyhawk is compatible with those ideas. Sure, they might need a single sentence "Goliaths live with Giants", but do we really need to explicitly state that Sorcerers are in Greyhawk? Sorcerers have been in Greyhawk since 2000. Warlocks? They were also in 3.5, so since 200X. Good Orcs? Since the 80'sAnd, let us say that you are right, people will freak out if these things are added without extensive coverage on how this happened... who are those people? Are they new DMs how have never built a world before, but are also deeply attached to a setting that has been without a publication for nearly 25 years? Who is that? The people who will freak out, are not the same people who need basic worldbuilding advice. And, if you are showing how to build a world, and you "need" to explain something like Dragonborn... then you can do that as part of teaching how to world-build. It isn't difficult. I've done it myself. Multiple times. Even in this thread. Yet, this is a death knell showcasing that the choice of Greyhawk is completely unsuitable?</blockquote>