Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9356346" data-attributes="member: 6801228">So, this is all based on &quot;greyhawk isn't a perfect fit for 5e, and I expect WotC to fail at everything, because I say they have always failed, so this will be a failure and they should have picked something else they wouldn't fail at.&quot; Yeah, you are just not going to convince me that WoTC is so incompetent that they cannot possibly do this right, but if they had decided to make an entirely new setting and spit in the face of people who want something rooted in the 50 year history of the game, for the anniversary, that they would have succeeded. If they could succeed with a new setting, they can do it with Greyhawk, Especially since the majority of your 25% incompatibility isn't even actually incompatible. It is just people declaring that WotC is incompetent, or that somehow the setting that is the source of most of the BBEGs in DnD 's history was not built for people to fight BBEGs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9356346, member: 6801228"] So, this is all based on "greyhawk isn't a perfect fit for 5e, and I expect WotC to fail at everything, because I say they have always failed, so this will be a failure and they should have picked something else they wouldn't fail at." Yeah, you are just not going to convince me that WoTC is so incompetent that they cannot possibly do this right, but if they had decided to make an entirely new setting and spit in the face of people who want something rooted in the 50 year history of the game, for the anniversary, that they would have succeeded. If they could succeed with a new setting, they can do it with Greyhawk, Especially since the majority of your 25% incompatibility isn't even actually incompatible. It is just people declaring that WotC is incompetent, or that somehow the setting that is the source of most of the BBEGs in DnD 's history was not built for people to fight BBEGs. [/QUOTE]

Verification