Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9358989" data-attributes="member: 6801228">So, on top of world-building, you want to rewrite the cosmology of DnD? That would be best served for a chapter on the cosmology of DnD, and it would also absolutely NOT contain four brand new planes of existence that have never been tested or expanded on. That is such a blatantly unreasonable set of expectations.No, it absolutely is not. You can use examples and demonstrations FROM the PHB, and if you do it correctly, it applies to everything. If you show how a species can be created, then you have shown them how to make everything imaginable, and if you show them how a species can be integrated or changed, you can do that with every species imaginable. But there is a lot of risk and little reward in just spouting off things they have no reference to.That is literally what I was asking you. After all, we aren't talking about the DMG in general, but the worldbuilding chapter of the DMG.Of course I can imagine them doing that. But when talking about the worldbuilding chapter, and asking you about the worldbuilding chapter, and talking about the worldbuilding chapter.... I cannot assume you are suddenly talking about a different chapter for no reason!So you want to make it worse by making the resource less inviting to new DMs? That seems counter-productive to everything you keep going on about.</blockquote>