Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greyhawk, Eberron, and Genre in Campaign Settings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 9395778" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>Brian Attebery described genres, particularly fantasy, as "fuzzy sets" - not defined as much by a boundary as to what is or is not within the genre, but by relationship to a center point, which may be represented by a kind of "ur-text" (or set of core texts; e.g. LotR for epic fantasy, Conan for S&S).</p><p></p><p>D&D is tricky, because it is almost its own family of genres. We could say that the ur-text is early D&D as a whole, both OD&D, Basic, and 1E -- how D&D was originally played and envisioned. But it has expanded quite a bit beyond that, and includes a variety of secondary and related fuzzy sets. And really, every player has their own ur-text, whether a particular edition or campaign setting.</p><p></p><p>In truth, I see this as the underlying purpose and even beauty of campaign settings, that I think is implicit in their creation and use: each one creates its own sub-genre, its own fuzzy set. But I also find that this sometimes clashes with what we could call "canonical purism," that is, adherence to whatever the latest version of canon is. This tension pops up in different ways - perhaps the insistence by some that a particular setting must include (or exclude) certain elements of canon. Or the old classic "I want to play X," player says; DM replies, "Sorry, they don't exist in this world." "But they're in the rules!" Etc.</p><p></p><p>I think the idea of D&D as a toolbox is useful here, which implies that you don't have to use all the tools (I mean, you can't possibly include <em>everything, </em>except in potentia), and perhaps more importantly, you can use the tools as you want to. Screwdrivers are made to screw (heh), but you can also use them to pry open paint cans or scratch an itch. If you're designing a campaign world, as the DM, you may consider which races to include, whether they fit your core themes and vibe, and have to make choices: Do I exclude this race, or do I alter it to fit the vibe I'm going for? In considering player preferences, you then consider choices and compromises. For instance, if dragonborn don't fit the vibe you're going for but one of your players loves them, you then have to decide how to serve two masters. Maybe dragonborn don't exist in your world, but except as a random mutation or as the result of magic, or maybe the PC was transported from another world and is a unique specimen. And so forth.</p><p></p><p>In the larger picture, we can imagine a set of super-imposed, nested fuzzy sets, interacting with each other. You have "fantasy" and then you have "the D&D toolbox," and then you might have a specific campaign world, and then you have your version of it (or a homebrew), for which you might create an actual ur-text: a campaign document that describes the center around which everything relates.</p><p></p><p>Meaning, the toolbox and fuzzy set allow individual DMs--as campaign world creators--to envision their own "ur-text," and how different elements of the toolbox fit in, whether they fit at all, or how they can be made to fit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 9395778, member: 59082"] Brian Attebery described genres, particularly fantasy, as "fuzzy sets" - not defined as much by a boundary as to what is or is not within the genre, but by relationship to a center point, which may be represented by a kind of "ur-text" (or set of core texts; e.g. LotR for epic fantasy, Conan for S&S). D&D is tricky, because it is almost its own family of genres. We could say that the ur-text is early D&D as a whole, both OD&D, Basic, and 1E -- how D&D was originally played and envisioned. But it has expanded quite a bit beyond that, and includes a variety of secondary and related fuzzy sets. And really, every player has their own ur-text, whether a particular edition or campaign setting. In truth, I see this as the underlying purpose and even beauty of campaign settings, that I think is implicit in their creation and use: each one creates its own sub-genre, its own fuzzy set. But I also find that this sometimes clashes with what we could call "canonical purism," that is, adherence to whatever the latest version of canon is. This tension pops up in different ways - perhaps the insistence by some that a particular setting must include (or exclude) certain elements of canon. Or the old classic "I want to play X," player says; DM replies, "Sorry, they don't exist in this world." "But they're in the rules!" Etc. I think the idea of D&D as a toolbox is useful here, which implies that you don't have to use all the tools (I mean, you can't possibly include [I]everything, [/I]except in potentia), and perhaps more importantly, you can use the tools as you want to. Screwdrivers are made to screw (heh), but you can also use them to pry open paint cans or scratch an itch. If you're designing a campaign world, as the DM, you may consider which races to include, whether they fit your core themes and vibe, and have to make choices: Do I exclude this race, or do I alter it to fit the vibe I'm going for? In considering player preferences, you then consider choices and compromises. For instance, if dragonborn don't fit the vibe you're going for but one of your players loves them, you then have to decide how to serve two masters. Maybe dragonborn don't exist in your world, but except as a random mutation or as the result of magic, or maybe the PC was transported from another world and is a unique specimen. And so forth. In the larger picture, we can imagine a set of super-imposed, nested fuzzy sets, interacting with each other. You have "fantasy" and then you have "the D&D toolbox," and then you might have a specific campaign world, and then you have your version of it (or a homebrew), for which you might create an actual ur-text: a campaign document that describes the center around which everything relates. Meaning, the toolbox and fuzzy set allow individual DMs--as campaign world creators--to envision their own "ur-text," and how different elements of the toolbox fit in, whether they fit at all, or how they can be made to fit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Greyhawk, Eberron, and Genre in Campaign Settings
Top